http://www.amazon.com/MAN-MONA-LISA-SMILE/dp/1630683558/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1392403641&sr=1-1&keywords=JFK+Hooke
I congratulate them for their accomplishment. But, in the process of sending out an email announcement about it, an outside agitator wound up on Richard's list of recipients, and it's yet another JFK buff who refuses to identify himself. But, I'll give you his email address:
beatles.rule@yahoo.com
So, he responded derogatorily to Richard, and I don't know if Richard responded back to him or not, but I did. And then Beatles Rule wrote back to me, and then I responded again. And I am going to share this correspondence with you. And I am doing so because this is a guy who is full nerve and attitude- he thinks he's some kind of tough guy- but ultimately, he's just a stupid fuck, and it's very easy to slap him down.
Beatles Rule:
Okay, DIPSHITS, I've proven you wrong before but it's
worth repeating. I'll type slow for you stupider
ones...
1. There is no reliable proof that the photo is timed
exactly when JFK was shot.
2. Why would anybody need to
spend all that time and effort doctoring the photo, why wouldn't they just have
got rid of it to "remove" Oswald from the doorway? DUH!
3. Most important, where are
the eyewitness statements placing Oswald in the doorway? Look at all the people
standing there, certainly someone (especially coworkers) would have remembered
him being there, especially when the guy is arrested for the crime a few hours
later. I conclude the answer is because there is no one who corroborated that.
Fifty years later still no one has come forward??? Now you can reply with some
stupid bullshit that "the government" shut up all those people in the doorway.
But that massive coverup didn't do anything about all the people saying they
heard or saw shots from all over the place??? And, right, a massive coverup of
this scale that would obviously involve numerous co-conspirators doesn't suffer
a single leak in fifty years? As if our government was capable of keeping
anything a secret.
Face it, you are all a bunch of
losers who have WAY too much time on your hands. Why don't you do something
useful with your time and help the poor and needy or
something!?
Ralph Cinque:
1. There is no reliable proof that the photo is timed exactly
when JFK was shot. You can see JFK reaching for his throat, so
you know it was right after the shot to his throat.
2. Why would anybody need to spend all that time and effort doctoring the photo,why wouldn't they just have got rid of it to "remove" Oswald from the doorway?
The photograph had tremendous propaganda value, showing as it does the TSBD and the SS agents
peering back at it. The caption they wrote even says
that the SS agents were looking for "the source of the shots." 3. Most important, where are the eyewitness statements placing Oswald in the doorway? The Warren Commission was not going to allow anyone to say they saw Oswald in the doorway. It was a kangaroo court,a show trial. If anyone tried to say it was Oswald, they would have been visited by big tall men in dark suits and sunglasses,speaking in gruff monotone voices and warning them not to say it again or even think it. But, you want to know who said it non-verbally? Billy Lovelady when he drew an arrow to Black Hole Man to indicate himself. The Warren Commission allowed witnesses to say they heardshots from the grassy knoll because that could be easily rationalized by echoes from the tall buildings or just plain error. People are often mistaken about the direction of sounds. But, you can't be wrong about someone who was standing two feet away from you. So, they were never going to allow anyone to say it was Oswald in the doorway.
This beatles.rule guy is a very unintelligent person, incapable of clear thinking.
Beatles Rule:
That is your proof? What a joke. Propaganda value? "They" put out a photo of Oswald in the doorway and thought doctoring it was a better idea than getting rid of it? That is just plain stupid. Okay, Einstein, using your logic from your answer to my last point, why would they need propaganda if they could just shut everybody up and force their version of things on everyone? Well, because they can't, as your last "answer" makes even less sense. The Warren Commission shut people up? It was a COMMISSION, dumbfuck, it had no ability to shut people up, especially
months afterwards.
Your stupid bullshit is so lacking in simple logic it makes no sense. You are a complete, laughable joke. You couldn't prove water is wet!
Your problem is that you don't know how to think. To paraphrase Jim Fetzer: if the Altgens photo shows Oswald in the doorway-and it does- then he was in the doorway; and that's true whether it was a good idea for them to release the photo or not. And it's especially true in this case since there was only one other person on Earth whom Doorman could be. Only one other guy had to be ruled out. And it turns out that it's very easy to rule him out.
And, if it was just plain stupid for them to publish the altered Altgens photo instead of just getting rid of it, it was their stupidity- not mine. And what I attribute it to is: arrogance; and I'm sure they had plenty of that.
And you are questioning the propaganda value of the Altgens photo? If it didn't have propaganda value, then why did Walter Cronkite show it on national television the evening of November 22? It was an AP photo. Weren't they generally associated with newspapers? So how did it wind up in the hands of a television network? Apparently, they were more focused on the propaganda value of the photo than its potential to do harm.
And, haven't they forced their version of events on everyone? Don't they control what's taught in the schools? Don't they control what's issued by the media, that is, the mainstream media? But, just because they have a lot of force and control doesn't mean that they can shut everybody up. From the beginning, there were brave souls, such as Mark Lane, Harold Weisberg, and Vincent Salandria. Then came people like Jim Marrs and Penn Jones and others. Since we have freedom of speech in this country, they couldn't shut anybody up. All they could do was try to marginalize JFK truthers, as they still attempt to do. How much media attention did Jim Douglass get with his book compared to Gerald Posner and Vince Bugliosi with theirs? This isn't Communist China or Stalinist Russia. They can't throw people in prison or banish them to the gulag for writing books about JFK truth.
And today, with the Internet being what it is, they have less control than ever, and they can't possibly win. We all know how this is going to end. The official story of the JFK assassination is like a chicken running around with its head cut off, which is to say: it's already dead.
And hey, I've got news for you, pal: I'm making you famous! Check out my blog. You think you're clever? You haven't landed a blow. You are just showcasing the stupidity of the whole resistance.
It was Oswald in the doorway, and if you were smarter, you would know enough to shut the fuck up. That's because a good man always knows his limitations.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.