Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Wow, Richard Charnin is really on a tear. He has taken up my cause about the finding of Lovelady's arrow in CE 369, and he is posting about it on all the JFK forums on Facebook, there are a lot of them. Way to go, Richard! 

And it really makes sense becaues it comes down to logic:  We know that the big arrow that we can plainly see is Frazier's arrow. But, we know that Lovelady also drew an arrow on CE 369. This other mark that I found is the ONLY other mark on the photo. Therefore, ipso facto, it must be Lovelady's arrow.

And, it makes sense from the standpoint of the testimony too because it said that Lovelady drew his arrow in the dark. If I'm right, then the little line on BH Man's forearm would be the tail of Lovelady's arrow, with the bulk of it, including the head, being located in the black space of BH Man's enclosed arms, which conforms with that testimony. And notice that angle of Lovelady's arrow is exactly the same as Frazier's. Did Lovelady take his cue from Frazier? Or is it only natural to draw such an arrow at 45 degrees? Take your pick. Either way, that is Lovelady's arrow, and anyone who disagrees needs to find an alternative. That is their only way out. 

This is like a chess game where one player has an obligatory move. 
My opponents need to find another arrow for Lovelady or shut the fuck up.