Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, I asked you a question: How is that Towner Woman holding up that baby? She is not using her left arm to do it because her left arm is waving at the President. And she's not using her right arm either that we can see. 

And it is something she has in common with the Altgens Woman: Both are holding up kids but without using their arms to do it:

It's obvious that the Altgens Woman on the left can't be using her left arm to hold the boy, since it's on the wrong side. But, if she were using her right arm, wouldn't we see it? As his sole support, wouldn't it have to wrap around him all the way to where we could see it? Are we supposed to believe that he is just sitting on her arm? But, it doesn't look like he is sitting at all. Who sits like that? And if he were just sitting on her outstretched arm, she'd have to be Superwoman. She is erect. He is erect. Neither one of them is leaning. And she's a tiny little woman. Who holds a kid like that? A big strong man wouldn't hold a kid like that. That kid looks pretty big to me, and I don't think she could hold him for very long with two arms. Make it one arm, and it's theoretically possible but highly improbable. But no arms? That is what we are seeing: no arms of hers are holding that boy. 

And likewise for the Towner Woman, neither arm is holding up that baby. So, what is holding it up? Nothing! It's an imaginary baby.