As I said, one would have to be extremely gullible to believe that this photo got accidentally damaged because once it was dry, it was darn hard to do. It would certainly take more than a dry thumb.
Furthermore, how exactly does one "accidentally" do that? An accidental contact would be like glancing it or brushing it, but there you are talking about a direct downward plant of the thumb, rather like getting fingerprints made.
That is what we are talking about here, and I demand that people stop being stupid, stop behaving like children, and start calling a thing what it is.
You know my opinion about JFK "coincidences" and now I'm telling you that I have got the exact same attitude about JFK "accidents". I DON'T BELIEVE IN THEM!
So, the only question is WHY did they deliberately damage this photo?
Well, to answer that, think about the answer to this: Why did they keep getting Mary's photo back from her, the original? It's well established that they made a copy of it on the very day it was taken. In fact, it's well known that they made a negative of it so that they could, thereafter, produce as many prints of it as they wanted. Therefore, WHY did they have to keep going back to get hers?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.