Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I asked you a question, Unger. Why didn't you include this Bell frame in your 208 frame collection from the Bell film?

You don't get to take the 5th, Unger. So, answer the question.

Now, as far as this goes, they are very different.

On the left, the boy is being held very close to the woman. He's got his arm around her neck. And the effect is to transfer his body weight to her body. But, the girl on the right has no connection to the mother that we can see. If the mother has her arm out and the girl is on top of it, then all the girl's weight is on top of the arm with no help coming from her larger, postural muscles. And I guarantee you that her arm is not strong enough to do that. It's obvious that the woman on the left had to pick that boy up with both hands. She used both of her arms- for sure. And it's very likely that she was using both arms to hold him until the man started handing her the jewelry box. So, she let go with her right hand so that she could take the box. But, the clock is ticking for her. Every second, the boy is feeling heavier and heavier. She couldn't last like that for very long- even with the help he's providing by snugging in close and wrapping his arm around her shoulder, which takes the pressure off her left arm. But, there is some pressure on it, and I assure you that that is a very temporary position for her. She would either have to get both her arms involved again, or make a different energy-saving adjustment or put the boy down. But, the woman on the right is watching a motorcade, and she couldn't possibly do it the way she seems to be doing it. Her muscle fatigue of that arm would set in very fast, and I mean within seconds. The idea that she could stand there doing that is ridiculous. And that girl is obviously sitting. Compare her arrangement to that of the boy. Are you following the geometry of the white line? That is a sitting position. And you can't actually sit on someone's arm. It's not a big enough surface, and it is not a firm enough surface. That is a fake image, and for you, or anyone, to try to defend it in 2015 with everything we know about body mechanics and ergonomics is an outrage. You're stupid, Unger. I've met kangaroos in Australia who were smarter than you are, and I have been there. I'm not joking. I really mean it. You're an idiot.