Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Take a look at this. It's a series of images of the same father and son taken once a year for 30 years, where in the last one, you see that there's a grandson.

http://www.yourdailydish.com/galleries/father-and-son-take-the-same-photo-every-year-for-30-years/ 

What I want you to notice is that the father's hair looks different every time. Sometimes long. Sometimes short. Sometimes neat. Sometimes wild. Sometimes curlier. Sometimes straighter. Hair changes. It never looks exactly the same.  

But, he was very lucky in that he kept all his hair. So, changes due to balding and receding were NOT an issue for him. Lucky guy. But, they were a very big issue for Billy Lovelady who was a RAPIDLY BALDING YOUNG MAN.

Therefore, this has got to be bogus:

That is supposed to be the hair of Billy Lovelady in 1957 and then again in 1963. Notice that it is the exact same length, the exact same lay, the exact same receding hairline, the exact same cut, the exact same everything. HE WAS A RAPIDLY BALDING YOUNG MAN. His hair wouldn't look exactly the same even if he wasn't, but the fact is: he was. This is bogus! They moved Young Lovelady's hairline over to Oswald in order to turn him into Lovelady.