But, you don't have to be a hand surgeon to see that that hand in the Jackson photo is a monstrosity. It is so contrary to the arrangement of a human hand that you know it is photographic monkey business.
What if someone showed this to John McAdams? He's not a hand surgeon, but he was a college professor, and they're supposed to be smart, aren't they? What would he say? There is as much chance of John McAdams denouncing the official story of the JFK assassination as there is of the Grand Imam denouncing Islam.
What he should do is get a camera out and try to duplicate the hand in the Jackson photo. It can't be done. They would try to approximate it, as close as they could, by contorting the hand as much as they could. But, it wouldn't be the same, far from it, and moreover: why would Oswald contort his hand after being shot? Why would he slap his arm to his chest after being shot? That's a fair question too, but if you make it that he slapped his arm to his chest and contorted his hand, now you're just being stupid. The hand has a neutral position. He's just been shot, and he's not going to think about doing anything weird with his hand.
The Jackson hand is indefensible, and anyone who tries to defend it will only dig himself in deeper and make it worse. That's why the smart thing to do, if you are working for the other side, is nothing. Absolutely nothing. Just ignore it and me. But hey, I'm not telling anyone what to do. If you think you can duplicate it or defend it, go ahead; make my day.
But, there are people who can see that I am right. And once they see it, they're never going to not see it. They're not going to wake up some morning and say, "You know, I think that hand in the Jackson photo is all right." Once they see it, they see it; and it's forever.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.