Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Now the New York Times is admitting something that David Crowe told us from the very beginning: that the PCR test is arbitrary, that it all depends on how many cycles you run Run enough cycles and anybody could test positive. They're admitting, for the first time, that many people who test positive, including most of those who aren't symptomatic, are NOT sick; that their positive test result is essentially a false positive. They admit here that the explosion in the number of Covid cases is due to the explosion in testing.

Their answer is to revert to the rapid test, but there is no reason to have faith in its accuracy either.

The situation is much worse than what they're saying, but, this is the New York Times, and for them, it is a huge admission. At least they are finally talking about meaningless results from the PCR test.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html