Some have tried to reconcile Oswald knowing that Shelley was in the doorway by saying that he must have gone to the front and looked through the glass and seen Shelley was there.
But, that is a very big concession. They're essentially saying that Oswald was at the doorway- at the brink of the doorway- but he just didn't step outside.
But, how the Hell do they assume the right to say that? Where the Hell do they get off imparting such a strange behavior to Oswald that of all the 75 employees, he should be the one who had no desire to see Kennedy? The vast majority of the 75 employees were outside, and among the few who weren't, most of them watched the motorcade from a window. Examples: Junior Jarmon, Harold Norman, and Geneva Hine.
When you place Oswald that close to the doorway, you can't help yourself to the right to say, "Of course, he had no interest in going out."
Oswald had been working in that dank building all morning, and it was nice and sunny outside. Oswald had gone to the library to check out JFK's book. Oswald had discussed JFK's visit to Dallas the night before with his wife, and she had expressed how much she wished she could see him. The two of them must have been very affected by the Cuban Missile Crisis, considering she was Russian, and he had lived in Russia, became a Soviet citizen, and had many friends there- more than he had in Dallas.
And you can't keep him inside because of any biological activities. He ate his cheese sandwich and apple earlier in the Domino room- that's on ice. His Coke came AFTER his encounter with Truly and Baker, who saw him with no Coke, but then Mrs. Reid saw him with a "full" Coke. So, you can't stick him somewhere eating or drinking. Besides, he, like the others, got off work at 11:45, which gave him 45 minutes to eat, drink, move his bowels, do whatever the hell he wanted in the biological realm.
He understood that the President was coming by at 12:30. 12:25 was the actual announced time. And just as others made a point to do their eating and drinking and excreting beforehand, so did he. There is no reason to think otherwise.
Where does this presumed indifference to JFK come from? What gives them the right to claim to know this about Oswald? Nothing gives them the right. The presumption is, and it is automatic, that Oswald had as much interest as anyone else in seeing Kennedy.
Let's get something straight: the only basis to say otherwise would be specific information, such as someone reporting that Oswald told them, "I have no interest in seeing Kennedy" or "I have no desire to see Kennedy; I couldn't care less about him; He's nothing to me."
Without specific knowledge such as that, no one has any right to assume he was any different from anyone else.
Then you've got that lying Will Fritz who actually told the Warren Commission that Oswald was "eating lunch with other employees" at the time of the shots. Other employees? So now, he's got a whole gang of people who would rather chow-down than see Kennedy? Who put off eating for 45 minutes just so that they could do it at an historic, once-in-a-lifetime moment? There were no such employees.
Will Fritz, if you can hear me from Hell, you are a dastardly liar. At the bidding of your masters, you falsely framed Lee Harvey Oswald. You probably had nothing to do with JFK's murder, but after it, you kept getting calls from Cliff Carter, LBJ's sidekick, hounding you to close the case because you "had your man." No, you didn't invent a bus ride and cab ride, but you lied plenty.
Watch this video of the murder of Oswald. Fritz is well ahead, but there's a delay. He's a little late in reacting. Looks to me like he's acting, putting on a show, like he knew very well what was going to happen. The commotion started before the gun blast went off. You can't tell me that Fritz' head wouldn't have turned immediately. It doesn't. Watch it. It's right at the beginning. Fritz is the second guy in a white hat. What an actor. Genuine startle reactions are immediate and involuntary.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pv_viK8qOfw
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.