Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The Wiegman film got edited; big time. And no, Backes, it wasn't innocent. 

You know that Wiegman did two pans of the TSBD doorway. The first is over and done with very fast- in less than a second. But, that was like a snail's pace compared to the second pan. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3J0CIlzxw7s

The first pan is the first second of the movie. The second pan occurs within the 4 second mark. But, I'm only referring to the actual exposure of the doorway, and it is quick. 

First, why did Wiegman do the second pan at all? He was moving down Elm Street, and all the action was forward. So, what caught his attention to swing around? There had to be a reason. Did he hear something? Did he see something out of the corner of his eye? 

And when he got to the doorway why did he exit so fast? Most of us have handled home movie cameras, and today, people are using digital cameras and even cell phones to make movies. And we all know that when you're filming, you don't go too fast- not if you want a decent picture.

So, look at that second pan a few times and notice how fast it is. He catches that doorway at the beginning of the 4 second mark, and it is over in a flash.  

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3J0CIlzxw7s  

So, why would Wiegman move so fast? What was his bleedin' hurry? And did he, in fact, move that fast?

The clearest individual frame we have from the Wiegman film is this one, and it comes from that second pan of the doorway.

With the camera moving so fast at that point in time, how could such a clear image as this result? We don't see anything as good as this when we watch the Wiegman film. It's all a blur when we watch it. So, where did this shimmering frame come from? Who made it?  

You know that many people, including Jack White, Doug Horne, and many others, say that the Zapruder film was altered, that frames were removed to hide the slowing and stopping of the limo. Probably at least half the JFK research community believes that. There is a lot published about it online, including on Youtube. 

Well, I am saying that the exact same thing happened with the Wiegman film. They removed frames from it in order to prevent us from getting a clear view of the doorway, especially on the second pan. Even the first pan was deliberately blurred, and it may have been shortened too. But, with the second pan, they removed most of it. They left just one flash of the doorway- just enough to give us a fleeting glimpse of Doorman to convince us that he was there. 

But, he was NOT there. Oswald had left. Oswald had departed for the lunch room, and it was between the first pan and the second pan. This is how it really was when Wiegman's camera reached the doorway the second time:

Wahlah! Doorman was gone! In other words, it's just like with the Squad room footage where they embedded an image of Lovelady into the film. Here's how that one really was. There was nobody there at that desk. 

Well likewise, there was no Doorman in the doorway at the time of the second pan. They installed that guy in there. And he is not the same man as the first Wiegman Doorman.

Those are not the same man. The shape of theirs heads is different. On the right, he has a bald round head compared to the rectangular shape on the left.  Their faces are different: gaunt on the left and chubby on the right. Their shirt openings are vastly different. The one on the right doesn't even look real. Their weights are different: slender on the left, and stocky and barrel-chested on the right. They're different men! It's plain as day. 

And since there is no reason to think that a different Doorman stepped in, it can only mean that the image on the right was faked. 

And that's why the second pan of the doorway happens so fast, faster than Wiegman could even have moved his camera. They removed frames to keep us from getting a good look at what they did. It was a still image added to a movie, and that's tough to do. How can you expect to get away with such crap? There's only one way: to reduce the amount of time it appears, to reduce it to a flash. 

So, look at this perfectly clear frame again but with a very jaundiced eye.

What the hell is that idiot doing there? You can see that everyone else in the picture is focused on what's going on. Why isn't he? Why is he just standing there, looking straight ahead, stiff as a board, stiff as a Cigar Store Indian, totally detached from the the peril of the situation. To use bpete's term, he seems "disinterested." Joseph Backes says that he had already begun his personal mourning for Kennedy. Maybe he was saying the first rosary for Kennedy. Sure looks like it. 

It doesn't even mesh with what Lovelady said. Lovelady said that at the time of the shooting that he was with people: Bill Shelley and Sarah Stanton to name two. Then, Gloria Calvary ran up and told them the President had been shot and that she saw the blood. Then, Shelley and Lovelady left for the railroad tracks and saw Baker climbing the steps from a distance. So, how does that mesh with Lovelady standing there alone, saying "Om" over and over to balance his chakras? It doesn't. 

The second Wiegman Doorman was not there. It's just like what they did with the Dallas PD footage where they installed a Lovelady figure at the desk in the Squad room. Here they installed him in the doorway to replace Oswald after Oswald left. And I don't assume it was the real Lovelady that they used either. They had their hands full keeping Lovelady on script with the official story. They weren't going to get him involved with making phony movies. Indications are that Lovelady wasn't a happy camper, and eventually, they had to off him. Better safe than sorry. 

They messed with the Wiegman film. They removed frames from it to speed it up. They wanted us to see that Doorman was still in the doorway- safe and sound- but without being able to get a good look at him. And eventually, they released this clear frame of him but without explaining how it came about. It's not from the film that we have. 

Somewhere, there is a good version of the Wiegman film that isn't blurry and isn't lightening fast. And that's where this frame came from.