Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Yes, that Altgens Woman is definitely holding the Altgens Boy with just one arm. Think about where her left arm is. If she were using it at all to help bear the load, it would be coming across in front, and we'd be able to see it. Right?

And it's even worse than that. Even if she were Superwoman and could support him with just one arm, how could she hold him up so straight? Wouldn't she at least lean him towards her? Wouldn't he intuitively lean towards her? Even Marco is arching his back some to get a lean going, but there isn't the slightest lean in either one of them.

The Idiot Backes likes to say that any woman can hold a child. But not like that woman she can't. 

bpete can tell you that on the old forums, at least my adversaries were smart enough to allege that the boy was standing on something to get that elevation. Of course, there was nothing for him to stand on. Hank Sienzant (an Op I outed after he claimed to be the Vice President of Customer Relations for a software company that served video game retailers. Apparently, the company was such a well-oiled machine, that the President didn't mind him spending the whole day JFKing) suggested that the boy was standing on the bumper of a car. I suggested that Hank go outside and stand on the bumper of his car. And no, it wasn't a wisecrack; it was a lesson.  

It is futile to defend this. No, Backes, that isn't an ordinary mother holding her son to watch a parade. It is the sign of a monstrous conspiracy to murder John Kennedy and frame Lee Harvey Oswald.