bpete, who should be called bbeaten, is now banking on a disparity between me and Larry Rivera.
Lock and load on this, bpete: The Oswald Innocence Campaign is an organization of JFK researchers who share the view that Lee Harvey Oswald was standing in the doorway of the Texas Book Depository during the assassination of President Kennedy and can be seen in the Altgens photo. That is the one common denominator that we all share. Otherwise, there is quite a bit of diversity.
Some members put stock in Judyth Baker, and others, like me, do not.
Some members think that Roger Craig saw the LHO of fame running towards and getting into a Nash Rambler to exit Dealey Plaza, and others, like me, think that he saw someone else who looked a lot like LHO.
Some members, and I would say many of us, believe the Zapruder film was altered while some think that it's authentic.
Some think that LBJ was the mastermind of the assassination, while others think that the real planners went to him.
Some members think that through Meyer Lansky, the Mossad had a role in the JFK assassination, while other members dismiss that entirely.
So, the next time you get the urge to assume that I and Larry Rivera should necessarily agree on every photo interpretation, you can get together with Joseph Backes and start working those proscenium arches.
Larry, like many others, makes a mistake when he assumes that the figures in Altgens can be correlated with the figures in Wiegman. Altgens was altered. Wiegman was altered. Ipso facto, you can't assume shit when it comes to correlating.
This figure in the Wiegman film is suspicious even within the Wiegman film, never mind trying to correlate it to anything in the Altgens photo. It appears to be a man with an elbow like a club and a very defined biceps muscle. Otherwise, he looks slender. His chin is jutting out like maybe he may have a goatee.
He's got a towel or something draped over his right shoulder. And he is dressed completely in white in what looks to be one garment.
We don't see any division between shirt and pants, and we see no sign of a belt. He certainly appears to be a man since his bodily shape is masculine, plus his muscles, plus his large hands, his wide wrists, and his goatee. But what kind of garment is that? Is it a Roman toga? Who would go to work at a warehouse dressed like that?
So, this figure, whom I call the Old Geezer, is a question mark all by himself- never mind trying to find him somewhere else. But to equate him with the petite young woman in Altgens is insane:
That is not the Old Geezer from Wiegman. She's not even in the same location as the Old Geezer from Wiegman. But, it is absolutely insane to suggest that she is the same person as him.
You listen and listen well, bpete: Those two are NOT the same person. I don't give a shit if you think they are. I don't give a shit if Larry Rivera thinks they are. I don't give a shit if Robin Unger or anybody else thinks they are. They are not. They could not possibly be. And all we can see is that she looks like a normal person, while he looks freaky for reasons unknown, and that's it. That's where we stand. That's all we know at this juncture.
Finally, bpete needs for me to define the word rim:
rim: the usually curved or circular border or edge of an object.
I used the word rim because at the beginning of Casablanca, one my favorite movies, they speak of Casablanca being located on the "rim of Africa". So, they transferred the rim of Lovelady's head to Oswald.
This is not confusing, but bpete tries to make it confusing because he is a paid dis-info agent, and that is his job. It is a wicked occupation.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.