Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Here's something I consider interesting and significant. It's Tina Towner talking about her experience on the day of the assassination, and right at the 4:40 mark, she says the following:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8K8LscqNO4

"By the end of the day, they were asking people to bring the film in for development, to be developed and viewed. The Dallas Morning News is what I remember." 

And then momentarily she added:

"My dad did just what they were asking him to do. He took the undeveloped film and the stills down to the Dallas Morning News and handed it over." 

Suffice it to say that if Ralph Cinque had been her daddy, he would have told her: 

"Honey, the film and photos are ours, and we are not turning them over to anybody. They are private property: OUR private property. This is supposed to be a free country where property rights are respected. And, the only way they're going to get these materials from me is if they pry them from my dead hand." 

Now, that's just me. But, the point is that the government sought to gain control and possession of all JFK assassination imagery IMMEDIATELY and with extreme pressure and authority. They did the exact same thing after 9/11. 

And the fact that it involved taking it to the Dallas Morning News meant nothing. You should just think of them as an arm of the government. Government/media collusion after the assassination was absolutely sickening, and of course, it has continued to this day, as we saw in the run-up to the 50th.  The AP, Life Magazine, the Dallas Times Herald, the Dallas Morning News, Backes' beloved WFAA Television, and many more became instruments of the conspiracy.  

And what about Dan Rather at CBS? Look at the crap he spewed. He said that the way Kennedy came to be shot in the neck from the front is that he was turned all the way around in the limo (meaning that he did a complete 180) and Oswald shot him that way and that it could be seen in the Zapruder film. And years later, what about Peter Jennings at ABC with that awful program he did? It included this awful cut and paste job of the phony Marguerite Oswald's face over the body of the real Marguerite. 

That is fake! Look how pasty her face is. Look at the contrast in color between her face and her neck. It's like she's wearing a freaking mask. And her face doesn't even "fit" right; it's making her neck look much wider than it was.  

This is the 21st century, and they're still pulling crap like this to keep the ruse going? Unbelievable. 

The media is guilty. Guilty as sin. They have blood on their hands. And there is an awful lot of blood on an awful lot of hands.