Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, what we have on 9/11 is a situation where, theoretically, a relatively small piece of steel fell on top of a very large piece of steel. And the very large piece of steel (over 90 stories in the case of the North Tower) was designed to support the weight of the small piece all the time and had been doing so for 30 years. 

The only extra thing added was the momentum of the small piece as it fell. But, that wouldn't be hard to test. It could be done on a small scale. There is no way way the small piece could have collapsed the big piece - even if it had been dropped from the stratosphere. 

I want you to see how small the impact crater was. 

That is a woman standing there in the crater. So, it was hot enough to melt steel was it? If the part above the crater collapsed down on the behemoth below, the energy would have been absorbed and dissipated very quickly. I mean that the energy of collapse would have been all gone very quickly. It wouldn't have continued on down the building. Based on what? It's ridiculous. Energy doesn't go on forever. Remember that the momentum was the only extra thing involved. The lower part was used to supporting the weight of the upper part all the time. And, that momentum would have been all gone, all used up, very quickly. 

In other words, even if it could theoretically have started to collapse, the collapse wouldn't have lasted. It would have run out of energy. The momentum would have been gone. And the rest of the building would have been more than capable of supporting the now still weight of the piece above which had fallen. 

It's just bull shit. Complete, total, utter bull shit, coming from the same people who have been telling us that Oswald shot Kennedy even though he was standing in the doorway at the time. 

   
This, of course, shows a person, said to be a woman, standing right in the impact crater. Some hot fire, eh? 

What would cause it to suddenly blow up like this?

Blow up? That would be the work of bombs. 

You know, I don't know which disgusts me more: the official story of 9/11 or the official story of JFK. Both are such wickedness. The story, like the act itself, is EVIL.  Look at the intact North Tower on the right. They mean to tell us that a gravitational collapse from the top fell straight down through all of that mass? That there was enough energy to do that? To overcome all the inertia of a building that was largely uncompromised, that had all of its mass, that had all of its resistance to deformation, as you can plainly see? 

Dirty, rotten, stinking bastards; I tell you they are killers. They are dastardly, bloody killers just for saying it. May God damn them to Hell.