Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

bpete, you god-damn right it means something: 

The above from Mark Lane's 1966 book Rush to Judgment establishes clearly his compelling interest in the Doorman question and his grave suspicion about the official story. Was he as definitive and certain about it as I am today? No, but he didn't do the detailed photographic analysis that I and others have done. We are definitive; we are certain that it was Oswald in the doorway. No ifs, ands, or buts. But, it's EASY for us to have reached certainty about it with all the advantages we have today with computers and internet. Yet, we stand on the shoulders of people like Mark Lane and Harold Weisberg and Penn Jones and Jack White. 

Penn Jones was another brilliant advocate for Oswald in the doorway. He closed the Forgive My Grief IV with nothing but a full page picture of Billy Lovelady- the one taken by Mark Lane's photographer. 

That's where I got it from: Penn Jones's book, Forgive My Grief IV. 

And in his newsletter, he covered it too:

 That is a great article by John Johnson and published by Penn Jones. You can see the date was May 1998. And it's long too; he covers a lot, including the testimonies. 

The one thing that disappoints is that he too didn't broach photographic alteration as an explanation for what we see either. But, I honestly feel it's because of lifelong brainwashing. Odd as it may seem, they thought that government officials, as high up as the Vice President, were capable of slaughtering the President, but they wouldn't alter a photograph. Photographic alteration is associated with the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany but not the United States of America. Right?  Bull shit. As Jack White told us, they manipulated every image and film they could get their hands on connected with the JFK assassination. 

Mark Lane never cited photographic alteration as an element in the case either, and for the same reason I gave above that he was conditioned by a lifetime of government brainwashing not to think that such a thing could ever happen in the USA. But, that was before the OIC came along. A lot has changed. 

In fact, you can divide the whole history of the case into two periods: pre-OIC and post-OIC. It's no exaggeration to say that we have completely turned around the Doorman issue, and I guarantee you that it is NEVER going back to the status quo that existed before we came along. 

Hey bpete: this is the same man wearing the same clothes on the same day, and there is no other possibility. 

You can play the loud noise you call music; you can childishly defile images to the limit of grotesque; and with your filthy mouth, you can spew the evil that is your rotten soul, but you can't change this. You can't get Oswald out of the doorway.