Notice that there are no facial features registering on Wiegman Doorman, unlike on Oswald and Altgens Doorman. He is in a much lower threshold of visibility than the other two. There is simply no comparison. To make any judgment about the shape of his t-shirt is totally unwarranted. That information is unavailable on him. All this is demonstrating is just how corrupt you are, bpete. You are utterly corrupt, and stupid as well.
We are in a better position to make a judgment about Wiegman Doorman2 because we are facing him more squarely.
About him, you get the sense that he had a short neck, unlike Altgens Doorman whose neck was long.
You see what I mean? How it was no neck/neck, no neck/neck, no neck/neck, no neck/neck. Wiegman Doorman2 had essentially no neck while Altgens Doorman had a long neck. There is NO WAY they could be the same man, for that and MANY other reasons. But, when we compare Wiegman Doorman1 and Altgens Doorman:
Remember that we don't have a clear version of Wiegman Doorman1 as we do of Wiegman Doorman2. Robin Unger gave us the clear frame of Wiegman Doorman2, but he provided no such clear frame of Wiegman Doorman1. So, all we've got is the crappy frames of him from the online videos. And they are all crappy, believe me. This is the best.
Get this into your peat moss brain, bpete: That image of Wiegman Doorman1 is not only blurry, it is frankly distorted. It is vague; it is nebulous; it is cloudy; and the image quality is way too poor to make any judgments about the shape of his t-shirt. And if you EVER again make derogatory reference to me relying on "blurry" images to draw conclusions, so help me I will swim across the Atlantic Ocean to the UK to have it out with you, you slimey, limey bastard.
You haven't made a criticism. You've just made a ploy. You just played a card that you thought you had in your hand- BUT YOU DON'T!
And it only manifests your gross immaturity because we are dealing with a situation in which perfection is never going to be found. It is definitely a case in which we have to determine the BETTER match, the better choice. And there is no doubt that, in the aggregate, based on what we can see, Wiegman Doorman1 makes a much better match to Altgens Doorman than Wiegman Doorman 2, and Oswald makes a better match to both of them than Lovelady.
View it vertically on the left. Observe the perfect match of the open sprawl between Wiegman Doorman1 and Oswald. That is a large structural element that came through despite the blur. Now look at the lower right at the figure of Lovelady. His shirt wasn't opened at all except for the top button. Why are we even talking about this? It's open and shut. It was Oswald in the doorway.
And that's right, bpete, I said they didn't just paste Lovelady's head on Oswald's head, meaning his WHOLE head. Instead, they just moved his "cap" over.
That's the cap instead of the whole head. The cap instead of the whole head. The cap instead of the whole head. Get it? Is it sinking in?
And no, bpete. What supports Buell Frazier being the guy with the long legs, the black hair, wearing the black jacket and the light pants is finding the image of Frazier at the PD with his black hair, black jacket, light pants, and long legs.
That's what makes the case for Buell Frazier in the Wiegman doorway, you dumb cluck.
You lose again, bpete. You're just an idiot with an attitude. You NEVER score a point. I ALWAYS knock you on your ass. You haven't begun to challenge me. And it's a hopeless endeavor because I'm right and you're wrong. It was Oswald in the doorway. We can see him in the Altgens photo. We can see him in the first second of the Wiegman film. And you are NEVER going to overcome that. And every time you open your rotten mouth, it only gets me to drive the facts home even more firmly. So, keep it up if you want to. But, don't you ever again accuse me of using blurry images because if you, you just might see my bad side.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.