Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The magnitude of bpete's childishness, foolishness, and imbecility has reached a new low. Is he deteriorating from drowning himself in Grey Goose or is the desperation of his failing situation simply overwhelming him? Who knows and who cares. 

But, it does make me realize something: There are people in this world who are incapable of malice. I am not one of those people. I am very capable of malice, and I have malice aplenty for the God-damn Kennedy-killers with whom I do battle. 

Amazingly, the blithering fool starts by challenging the likeness between Doorman and Oswald in this collage.

Starting from the top down, he first points to the differing hairlines. Well, I have already accounted for that; they moved Lovelady's hairline over to Doorman. 

They did on a small scale to Doorman what bpete did to me.

Alright, so bpete did it moving my entire face over to another man's body, and the JFK conspirators did it by moving just the cap of Lovelady's head over to Oswald's body. That accounts for what we see on Doorman's rim.

The next foolishness of bpete's is so outrageous, it is unbelievable. He actually denies the match of the furls below the collar because, presumably, he doesn't think it's perfect enough.

That is ridiculous! It was a different moment in time and space. The shirt was constantly shifting! It didn't have to look exactly the same. Yes, bpete, it IS found there. We are seeing the same collar and the same furl underneath it. Here is another comparison:

The Altgens crop is enlarged and distorted. You can't expect it to look exactly the same. But, under the circumstances, it is an excellent match, and you can't expect it to be any better. Oswald was moving around, and the shirt was moving around freely on him. My Good God, it is imbecilic to expect perfection and complain about the lack of it. What an asshole! And if that isn't a good match, then you'd think he'd at least provide a better one with Lovelady. Here's one in which Lovelady posed as Doorman supposedly wearing the same shirt he wore that day.

Which two match? And who is the odd man out? bpete is totally off the wall, and he is just being the dirty, shit-faced mudder-rucker that he truly is. 

Then, regarding the other side of the shirt, bpete again denies the obvious:

You see the lapel on Oswald's left side, our right. It gave that tweed shirt a jacket-like quality. And that's exactly why Officer Marrion Baker described it as a "light brown jacket" when he saw it on Oswald in the lunch room just 70 seconds after the last shot.

But, because of the placement of Black Tie Man in the photo which obscured the left collar, we must resort to another means to verify the lapel on Doorman. The way to do it is to compare the thickness of the material on the left and right sides of his shirt.

You can see that Doorman's left shoulder was slashed away by the imposition of Black Tie Man. It even deformed his left ear and gouged out the left side of his face. Look how concave it looks compared to his right side, which is on our left. 

But, if you compare the left margin of his shirt with the right, you see that his left side is thicker than the right. It's thicker because it's folded over. It is exactly twice as thick because the material is doubled over forming the lapel. 

When you consider the distance that was involved, the enlargement that was done, and the poor resolution, this is the best we have to go by. But, that was a very good match of the whole shirt and t-shirt between the two of them. Would you consider this better?

Of course not. You would have to be completely out of your mind to think that. Lovelady's shirt matched better. It wasn't even sprawled open, so how could he be the same guy? But note that bpete made the claim without even offering an image of Lovelady. The shit-faced mudder-rucker actually had the nerve to say "it's still Lovelady in Altgens" without even providing an image. 

Next, bpete tries to make hay out of Oswald first having referenced "changing his britches" but then later mentioning shirt and pants.

bpete: Oswald did NOT change his shirt, and there is no question about it. Even the Warren Commission admitted that Oswald did NOT change his shirt. Marrion Baker recognized Oswald's arrest shirt on him in the lunch room. Mary Bledsoe recognized Oswald's arrest shirt on him on the bus. And most important: we can see dozens of matching points between the two:

So, you're just being a shit-faced mudder-rucker because a shit-faced mudder-rucker is what you are. Furthermore, there is no image of Lovelady from 11/22/63 that comes anywhere near matching what we see on Doorman. And again, bpete didn't offer one. It didn't even occur to him to do that. 

And yes, Buell Frazier most certainly changed his story. He first said that he was one step down from the top next to the railing. Then he changed it to this:

Mr. BALL - We have got a picture taken the day of the parade and it shows the President's car going by. Now, take a look at that picture. Can you see your picture any place there? 

Mr. FRAZIER - No, sir; I don't, because I was back up in this more or less black area here.

If he was one step down from the top, it wasn't a black area. I've been there on a sunny day in November, so I know. 

Mr. BALL - I see. 

Mr. FRAZIER - Because Billy, like I say, is two or three steps down in front of me.

Not true! Lovelady, by his own admission, said he was "on your top level."

Mr. BALL - Do you recognize this fellow? 

Mr. FRAZIER - That is Billy, that is Billy Lovelady. 

Mr. BALL - Billy? 

Mr. FRAZIER - Right

That was a reference to Doorman, but we know for certain that Doorman was on the top level. 

So, there is no way Doorman could have been 2 or 3 steps down in front of Frazier. Doorman wasn't 2 or 3 steps down in front of anybody. It was a lie. Frazier lied, just as you do, bpete, every day of your miserable life. 

Memo to bpete: I know Frazier said that Lovelady was 2 or 3 steps down in front of him, but Lovelady wasn't. Lovelady, like Oswald, was on the top level, just as he said.  

Mr. BALL - You were standing on which step?
Mr. LOVELADY - It would be your top level. 

And now bpete is claiming that this man was wearing a skirt:

That's because he found this image from the Darnell film which he assumes must be the same person:

Stop making assumptions, bpete. You're no fucking good at it.

And finally, bpete thinks he found Lovelady in the Darnell film:

No, bpete, that isn't Lovelady, and it isn't the Lovelady impostor from the Martin film either.

And it only goes to prove, bpete, that you are nothing but a dirty, shit-faced mudder-rucker. I equate you with the men who pumped bullets into Kennedy. If there's any distinction, it's that they are like mean dogs who shit in the park, and you follow them and pick up their shit with your bare hands. So, you've got their shit and JFK's blood all over you. That's who you are. And that's who you reveal yourself to be with every post you make, so keep it up. I'm not religious, but I do believe there will be a reckoning.