Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Unger says they're two different frames. But so what? They're from the same film and very close in time. So, why should one be distorted just because it's a different frame? Here they both are:

The one on top is the original one that Unger posted. The one on the bottom is the latest one. But why the brown streak across her eyes below? Why the misshape of the baby's body? And although you can't see it well at this distance, why the misshape of the baby's head? Why is the flicking hand so much more prominent below, and why is it white? Wasn't the skin tone of her hand the same as her face? What, did she suddenly have vitiligo on her hands? And why would her hand be directly above her head? Look at it again in the gif:

And come to think of it, I just thought of something. Let's assume there was about a second between those two frames. If she was moving her hand constantly waving, why is the hand in the exact same place?

Since Robin has reminded us that they are two different frames separated by a second or so of time, why is the hand in the same place in both directly above her head? Shouldn't it be a little different? 

It's a bogus image, Unger. It's as a fake as a three dollar bill. And you're just digging yourself in deeper denying it.