Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Bull shit is what you spew, bpete, not what you show. And this is a particularly nasty example of your evil bull shit:  

I've told the little shit a thousand times not to draw in the area under examination. But no, bpete. that is not Lewis' shirt. And that was not Roy Lewis' neck, at least not a sufficient amount of it.  And that is Doorman's cuff, which is to say Oswald's cuff.

Above we see exactly what Oswald was doing in the doorway, which was his habit, and his hand came out from the end of that cuff, although we can't see it. Roy Lewis's face is in profile, and that tells us where his body was, where it had to be. Here are some other men in profile.

Head, neck, and torso. Head, neck, and torso. It's all vertically aligned. That's how it has to be. Roy Lewis would be just as aligned and just as exposed in his neck and torso as these other guys. But, he's not. 

This is all we've got of Roy Lewis in the Altgens photo:

The rest is just your evil, Kennedy-killing mind at work, bpete. Doorman's cuff is covering Roy's neck and the top of his chest. And it doesn't matter if a little bit of his neck is there. If ANY part of Doorman is covering up ANY part of Roy Lewis, it has to be bogus. And there is much of him being covered up. There is a huge gap in him there. 

We are not seeing an intact Roy Lewis. We are not seeing a whole Roy Lewis. We are seeing an interrupted Roy Lewis- you dumb fuck. And your denying it only proves that you have the same mental capacity as Joseph Backes. 

And yes, I altered Oswald's image to fill in his shoulder, 

but there was nothing wrong with that. I was demonstrating how he looked before THEY altered him. What I did was open and honest. What they did was subterfuge. 

Now, here is what bpete claims is the Wiegman frame that corresponds to what we see of Roy Lewis in the Altgens photo:

The above is a crop from this:

bpete says that above, Lewis has "turned to his left to face Wiegman," implying that this is the frame that matches Altgens. It is utter bull shit. Look at it up close. Lewis hasn't budged.  

He's still totally oriented westward. Let's put it next to Altgens:

bpete, you are a liar, a deceiver, and a vicious, blood-soaked Kennedy-killer. You lock and load at John Kennedy every day of your stinking, miserable life. 

Oswald left the doorway very soon after the Altgens photo was taken, within two seconds. But no, his departure wasn't recorded by Wiegman because it took place between the first pass and the second pass. 

Here is the Wiegman film without any slow-motion. You'll see how fast that first pass was. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3J0CIlzxw7s

It's plenty fast, but it's nowhere near as fast as the 2nd pass, which occurs at the 4 second mark. Could Wiegman have even moved the camera that fast? And why would he have moved his camera that fast? Think about it. He decided to do another pan of the doorway. Why? Maybe he heard something. Maybe he saw something out of the corner of his eye. Was there a commotion? So, he went back to it. But, why wouldn't he stay put on it on for a while? Wouldn't he at least give it a second or more? Watch that second pan several times; it's around the 4 second mark. Would he, could he, swing the camera that fast? And in swinging it that fast, how could they possibly extract a frame from it that looks as clear as this?

What a crock of bull!  How could the clearest frame of the Wiegman film come from a moment in which Wiegman was swinging the camera at warp speed? Where the Hell did the above frame come from? Try to find it in the movie. I dare you. Try to stop on it. You can't do it. You couldn't do it in a million years. It isn't there. Not in the versions we have available to us. 

What I'm telling you is that they messed with this thing. They cut frames out. They created that lightening speed. Watch it again; it's just a blur. It wasn't Wiegman; it was them. When Wiegman swung his camera around, this is what he got:

Notice anything different? There was no Doorman there. Oswald had left. His spot was empty. They put the other guy in there, photographically. But, it was a still image added to a movie, and the only possible way to get away with it was to make it lightening-fast. 

Again, when you think about how fast Wiegman was swinging that camera, how could this ultra-clear frame be realized? It couldn't. 

It means that they have been fucking with us since Day 1, and now they've passed the torch on to bpete to fuck with us some more. 

And who are "they" bpete asks? "They" refers to the conspirators, the plotters, the killers of JFK. And I don't mean the multiple gunmen who carried out the triangulated attack. I mean LBJ, Dulles, McCloy, Ball, etc. Those guys. They are "they". And I don't mind adding your name to the list either. You're part of the modern-day "they". 

And no, bepete. People, the world over, recognized Oswald's clothes on Doorman. And that is a historical fact that they did so recognize him and match his clothing. 

Where's the collage showing Lovelady's clothing matching Doorman? You don't even attempt to post such a thing. The last guy who tried was one of your buddies from McAdams' forum. And note that he had to resort to an image from 4 years later, in which Lovelady had 4 years to come up with an outfit that was suitable. But still, he failed miserably. 

Finally, bpete wonders why I brought up Jack Ruby being in the Texas Theater, although he did not dispute it. But, how did Jack Ruby know to go there? How did he know that Oswald would be at the Texas Theater? You don't think it was a coincidence, do you?  

This supports my contention that Oswald was told to go to the Texas Theater. And it was probably Ruby who told him to go there. There was a credible report from a woman, a seamstress, who worked across the street from the TSBD, who heard from her daughter and several other children, that they saw Oswald and Ruby talking outside the TSBD after the assassination. There are no grounds to think that any such arrangement was made BEFORE the assassination. It had to have been made after the assassination. And since the number of people that Oswald could have talked to and interacted with after the assassination is very limited, it puts Jack Ruby at the top of the list for having told Oswald to go there. 

The idea that Oswald was ordered to go to the Texas Theater to meet somebody is not a Ralph Cinque idea. I didn't come up with it. Ever hear of Jim Douglass, bpete? Jim Douglass lays out a compelling case in JFK and the Unspeakable that Oswald was instructed to go to that theater, that it was a set-up, that the other Oswald was there, whom they skirted out the back door of the theater into the alley, which got witnessed. It's all there in the book. Read it!

But, my point is that the idea that Oswald was ordered to go to the Texas Theater- which is a widely held belief among JFK researchers- needs to be applied to why Oswald went to the lunch room. He was ordered to do so. And that's why I brought up Jack Ruby. 

Jack Ruby being in that theater is proof-positive that Oswald going to that theater was NOT his own idea. 

I'll say it again:

Jack Ruby being in that theater is absolute, indisputable proof that Oswald going to that theater was NOT his own idea. 

You failed again, MacRae. You didn't land a blow. You didn't score a point. All you did was smear more blood around- the blood of JFK with which you are covered from head to toe.