Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I wish to harp on the parallel between Zapruder film alteration and Wiegman film alteration. 

Jack White, among others, taught us that frames were removed from the Zapruder film in order to cover up not just the slowing of the limo but the stopping of it. That's right; the bastard Greer actually stopped the car during a hail of gunfire. Only after JFK received the fatal head shot did the SOB step on the gas. 

Well, likewise, frames were removed from the Wiegman film, and it was to prevent us from getting a proper look at the doorway and the Doorman in the second pan.  

As I said, Wiegman remained in the vehicle until the 6 second mark, which was after the second pan of the doorway. Here's a frame that you may consider the transition frame in which he filmed his hand. 

It's followed by a number of frames in which you mainly see the white car as he is exiting from it. Then, he's on the street, on the run, and you know he's done filming from the car. But notice the time of that transition frame 0:06 seconds. The second pan occurs at 0:04 seconds.

So, you can dismiss the utter stupidity of bpete and Backes who claim that Wiegman was already on foot when this was taken. Wiegman was, without a doubt, still riding in the press car when this went down. The above frame I obtained from the movie, but since we have the same thing in clearer form from Robin Unger, I'll switch to that.

It is very valuable to have this as evidence that a clear version of the Wiegman film exists- somewhere. But, you should realize that it was cropped some. If you look at the frame above it from the movie, you'll see that Wiegman caught some figures to the east of Doorman. It's pretty much a blur, but I don't know how they would have appeared in the clear frame. 

Why are the figures so blurry on the right side? Was someone moving? Waving his arms? Is that what caught Wiegman's attention and caused him to swing around? But, let's go back to the clear version even though it's cropped.

Who is the guy in front of Doorman?

Who is that guy, and what is he wearing. It doesn't look like normal clothes, not even for 1963. I call him the Old Geezer, and his outfit reminds of a Roman toga. It seems to be a one-piece garment from top to bottom. Like a dress? But, he's no lady. He's got muscular arms.

He is not the petite woman from the Altgens photo.

But, the question remains: Who the  hell is he, and why don't we see him in the Altgens photo? Compare the two doorways:

As I have explained, the Roy Lewis image in Altgens on the right is fake. You can see in Wiegman on the left that Roy Lewis was mostly cut off from Altgens' view. Maybe a little bit of his left arm and shoulder would have showed, but that's the maximum. He was never turned east; he was never looking east; hence the image of him on the right is bogus. 

But, I should think that Old Geezer should have showed up at least partially in the Altgens photo. In fact, I would be inclined to place him right about where we see the bogus Roy Lewis in the Altgens photo. He is definitely within the area of visiblility. Take a look:

That is just an approximation, but think about it. We know Old Geezer was down below Doorman, and we know he was a little west of him. So, he should fall largely in the area of visibility to Altgens.

One thing I have stressed to the other OIC members is that they should NOT expect to be able to correlate these images. As Jack White told us, there was widespread alteration of essentially all the JFK assassination images. So, trying to make everything fit is like trying to squeeze a square peg into a round hole. The plain truth is that the Altgens doorway and the Wiegman doorway CANNOT be correlated. Stop trying to make sense of something that doesn't make sense. They fucked with everything. Understand, Backes? From the other side, Jack White is going to piledrive that fact into your thick skull.