Roger Scott Cathey made a very big find tonight, and I must admit that, at first, I was dismissive of it. But then, as he expounded, I began to realize that there is substance in what he is saying. There was a JFK propaganda film made in 1964 by a famous filmmaker, and I forget his name. They got Frazier to reenact his movements on 11/23, and he wore a short-sleeved red and white shirt.
So, although there's no certainty, I think it's highly likely that they did get Frazier that shirt. and Roger put it well, that the purpose was to obfuscate. To muddy the waters. I've seen this happen before, for instance, the whole Prayer Man ruse. The guys pushing that are a bunch of trolls, and quite a few of the prayermanites are from Australia, and also from the UK, for the purpose of obfuscating Oswald being the Altgens Doorman, which he was. It's like they were out to create a heat sink- to draw people away form the truth, which is that we see Oswld in his arrest clothes in that doorway, exhiibiting his stretched and tattered t-shirt, and even standing with his habitual stance, clasping his hands in front, left over right.
So, who is Prayer Man? Nobody. He was invented. There is some phony doorway footage that includes him which is said to be from the Darnell film, which it's not- just as they fraudulently claim that the phony Lovelady clip (Gorilla Man) is from the Martin film.
But, enough about that. But, what makes this new discovery of Roger's so important is this: IF THEY WENT TO THE TROUBLE OF DRESSING FRAZIER IN A STRIPED SHIRT JUST TO OBFUSCATE LOVELADY HAVING WORN ONE, THEN IT CONFIRMS THAT LOVELADY REALLY WORE ONE. And that means that he can't possibly be Doorman, which means that Oswald was. And actually, we have already have more than enough proof that Oswald was the Altgens Doorman. Look at this work by Larry Rivera: his famous overlays which have wowed audiences all over the country. http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/.../oic-chairman... So. bravo, Roger. You did good tonight. I thank you for persevering. Your idea has grown on me. I think the likelihood that you are right is well over 90%.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.