Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 Now, let's look at the Ruby's mug shots from the Sheriff's Office. On the upper left, you can see that Ruby had quite a lot of scruffy hair growth on the back of his neck. I pointed an arrow to it. However, the Garage Shooter below had a very clean neck. And notice how long his hair was in back. It wasn't tapered at all. It just abruptly stopped, ending with a curl. And, it certainly looks like a wig. You don't see any hair growing out of his head. It's just a mop sitting there. That is not only a toupee but a bad one.

Then, on the upper right, it looks like someone took a Sharpie to Ruby's hair in front. It doesn't look like hair. It has none of the fineness of hair. It just looks like a smear of black.that was done with a wide felt pen.

The comparison picture below is from his trial. I've pointed out that no two images of Ruby show his hair exactly the same, and the range of appearances is very wide. But, what we see in the lower left is very common, where the hair is sparse and the strands are spread, and there is a weird parting of the sparse hair. But, just compare it to his Sheriff mug shot.

All of this enhancing of Ruby's hair was done because James Bookhout wore a thick mop of a hairpiece during the Garage Shooting.

Jack Ruby was not the Garage Shooter. Saying so is the same as saying that George W. Bush is Ronald McDonald. You can do it, but it's only because anyone can hit any keys on the keyboard.