Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This was my response to a guy on Facebook about Jack Ruby.

Tom Brock:  Wait. In that case, what are you doing here? Why are you wasting your time? If none of this matters, then why aren't you spending your precious time doing something else rather than being here and wrestling with me? The fact is that JFK was murdered by "the national security state" as the late great attorney Vincent Salandria put it. I had the privilege of knowing Vince. He was a member of my group, the Oswald Innocence Campaign. And he recounted to me how, at the time of the assassination, he was doubtful of Oswald's guilt from the start, and he told people, on November 22, that if Oswald dies and dies soon, then it means the State killed Kennedy; that it was a coup d'etat. 

You brought up the murder of RFK. I went to the Ambassador Hotel the night before just to observe the fanfare and preparations. The way they killed RFK, using Sirhan Sirhan as the patsy, that was modeled after the way they killed Oswald using Jack Ruby. Both Sirhan and Ruby were framed and innocent. Both were heavily drugged, although in Sirhan's case, it was drugs and alcohol, while in Ruby's case, it was just drugs: amphetamines and scopolamine. In both cases, they succeeded not only in convincing the world that each man did it; they were able to convince each of the men. 

With Ruby, even in his final interview, two weeks before his death, which was very likely a murder, he accepted that he shot Oswald, yet even then, he insisted that he had no intention of doing it, no plan to do it, and not the slightest memory of doing it. He only accepted that he did it because Dallas Police told him that he did. 

Another parallel between Sirhan and Ruby is that they were assigned the same doctor: Dr. Louis Joylan West, the "Maestro of Mind Control" whose nickname was Jolly. They flew West out to Dallas from Los Angeles, repeatedly, to treat Ruby. What, did Dallas have no psychiatrists at the time? Think about it. This was a local trial; not a federal trial. The Dallas County Jail, run by the Dallas County Sheriff Office, was responsible for Ruby's medical care. Dr. West was the top CIA mind control doctor at the time. So, how did Sheriff Bill Decker even know about West, let alone bring him out from L.A. to treat Ruby? Obviously, he was told to do it. 

I'm not as discouraged as you are about the truth winning out. In fact, I think it's inevitable. The Soviets tried to hide their slaughering of the Romanov family and their enterouge in Ekaterinburg in 1918, but in 1989, they were forced to admit it. And in the case of Oswald's murder, the truth is important because it was a psy-op on all of us. They bamboozled all of us with that phony Garage Spectacle, after which they slipped the real Ruby into the story. All it took was to closely compare the images of the Shooter to Ruby to realize that it wasn't him. The Shooter was shorter, fatter; his neck was shorter; his hair in back was very different, and he was clothes were different. For instance, the Shooter wore light socks while Ruby wore black socks, as you can see here. 

They were different men, and there is no doubt about it. We have all been lied to and manipulated about this for 59 years. Isn't that long enough? Shouldn't we, out of respect for our own minds, our own intelligence, get riled about this and say, "That's it. No more!"? This is about us being victims. It's about us being manipulated like Pavlov's dogs. And if you are wondering what they said when it was observed that Ruby and the Shooter wore different socks, they glibly said that they changed his socks because, after all, this was a City Jail, and wasn't it a routine practice to change the underwear of every detainee?