Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, you stupid mudderfruck. You really think Lovelady had a frame made of himself from the Martin film? Are you completely out of your mind? Where would he have gotten it? How would he have done it? And what makes you think he wanted to? 

If he did sign the back of the picture, then it was Robert Groden who must have come up with it. It wasn't Lovelady, you dumb pluck.

Then the Idiot goes on to say that Lovelady wasn't clean-shaven that day.

Even though I know very well that that wasn't Lovelady, it is officially an image of Lovelady from 11/22/63, and he appears to be clean-shaven. There is no reason to assume he had any facial hair to speak of. There is no more reason to think that he had facial hair than anybody else whose image we have from 11/22/63. 

Backes, there is no way these two can both be legitimate images.

And since it was from a film, and the frame on the left is from the film and consistent with the rest of the film, that is the one which displays the coloring correctly. Your attempt to defend as legit the grotesque image on the right is typical of you; it is typical of your blood-soaked, Kennedy-killing soul. You can't defend this crap, Backass. It's filth, and you're filth.