Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

No, Backes. What I asked is whether anyone specifically asked about the black patch at the bottom of his head which looks so artificial. We see how his hair looks above the patch, where we can see the strands and the scalp, and it has all the photographic features of hair. But, the black patch is really devoid of any visual data. It's just blackness, like black paint. 

  
So, I m asking that particular question about this particular picture, whether anyone else has questioned the way his hair looks. I can't think of any photographic or lighting reason why the bottom of his hair should look the way it does. 

And let's remember that all the Parkland medical people said that he had a blow-out wound there. Dr. McClelland said that the cerebellum was leaking out. Now, there are only two possibilities. The first is that McClelland and the rest of the Parkland doctors were wrong. 

The second is that the image is wrong because it was altered, that the conspirators covered up the wound by blackening it out. 

I can't think of any other possibilities, and I am inclined to believe the doctors. First, how could they be mistaken about it? And second, what possible reason would they have to lie?