Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Dave Reitzes is a longtime apologist for JFK officialdom, 9/11 officialdom, and more, and on McAdams forum, recently, to mock me, he cited Ed Chiarini who makes extremely outlandish claims in which he equates various celebrities based on their ears matching. Here's his site:

http://wellaware1.com/kennedy.shtml

One of the claims Ed makes is that Kennedy never got killed and that he resurfaced as Jimmy Carter. He provides this comparison of their ears:

You can see that Kennedy's ear was much more pointed and the internal helix was very different between them. So, they're not the same. And this is what I got when I did a comparison of my own.

It looks even worse. They're not the same at all. Either Ed Chiarini is incredibly stupid or he is working for the other side as a mocker. 

Let's look at another example of his. He says that Rene Angelli, the husband and manager of Celine Dion, is really Elvis Presley. The two on the left are his examples; the two on the right are mine made independently.

They're not the same. Angelli has a wider, shorter lobule than Presley had. And the cartilage of his helix is extremely sparse in back. Here is the comparison I made up-close.  

They're not the same ear. Chiarini is either crazy or he's CIA disinfo agent. And notice that he deliberately cut off Presley's ear to falsely equate it to Angelli's.

Chiarini deliberately sheared Presley's ear on the right (cropping it) to create the illusion of a match to Angelli on the left. That's dastardly. He may have thought of it himself, but this is just so outrageous, it seems like something the CIA would do. Look:

Left is Pressley's whole ear; center is Angelli; and right is the cropped version that Chiarini did. Without the cropping, you can readily see that the shape of the ears is different. 

My most recent example of ear biometrics concerns the match between Barbara Olson, the woman who made a technologically impossible phone call to her husband Ted Olson, the Solicitor General of the US, on 9/11 from American 77 AND Lady Booth Olson, who is Olson's subsequent wife. 

So, the question is: is Lady Booth Olson on the right really Barbara Olson after losing weight and undergoing facial plastic surgery?

Here is the comparison of their ears:

We should remember that it only takes one disconnect to sever a match, but I'm not seeing one here. And I know darn well that I didn't do anything to manipulate or falsify these images.  This is quite impressive for matching ears. But, if it was all we had, I wouldn't bet the farm on it, but when you the consider the other matches between them and the strange circumstance of Barbara Olson reportedly calling her husband from AA77 during the hijacking, which even the FBI said was impossible. And she claimed that not just the passengers, but the crew were herded to the back of the plane- as if there's any chance that Captain Charles Burlingame, a martial arts guy who taught counter-terrorism response at the Pentagon, would have turned the plane over to little Arab dudes just because they were waving box-cutters. 

Would Captain Charles Burlingame have said, "OK, you can have the plane; just don't hurt me with that box-cutter" ??? Would he have said that?

So then, they made up the story that they recovered his body at the Pentagon, and they discovered that he was bludgeoned to death. But wait, wouldn't Barbara Olson have known about that? Wouldn't she have told her husband Ted about that? How could the hijackers have hidden from the passengers the fact that they bludgeoned the captain to death? And what did they bludgeon him with? They were on a plane. And April Gallop was in the Pentagon, and she crawled out the hole, and she said there were no bodies- and not even any plane! If they found Charles Burlingame's body where it was whole enough to determine that he was bludgeoned to death, then they should have found lots and lots of bodies in there. But, we know for sure there were no bodies and no body parts outside the building, and nobody reported seeing any inside either. 

Anyway, we can safely dismiss Ed Chiarini. Either he's a crackpot or he's a CIA operative doing disinfo. And that would make him much like Dave Reitzes.