Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is Daniel Sheehan who teaches a course on JFK conspiracy theories, but from what I can tell, he is just another blowhard for the official story. They let him teach this course because he raises questions and then shoots them down. I listened to some of it just because someone asked me to. But, I noticed something interesting. It occurs at the 15 minute 40 second mark.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jutk9X9XzaI

Sheehan said: "Handwriting experts confirmed that it was Lee Harvey Oswald's handwriting on the order form for the rifle and also his signature when he signed for it at the post office."

You notice that he's got a big open book there, and it seems that he was pulling facts out of the book, including that one. But, I checked, and the form which Oswald had to fill out and sign, by law, in order to take possession of the rifle, and which, by law, the Post Office had to keep on file for 2 years, was never found. This is from the Fontaines' book:

 Why wasn't the signed release form found? It's because it was a conundrum. If it was signed "Lee Harvey Oswald" then why would the Post Office hand over a rifle sent to "A. Hidell"? And if it was signed "A. Hidell" then there had to be an official form showing that A. Hidell was a co-owner of the P.O. Box. And that didn't exist either. 

So, neither signature could work to get Oswald the gun. So, how did this maverick, open-minded, skeptical professor deal with it? He lied. Without addressing the problem, he just said that Oswald signed for it, and his signature matched his own handwriting. He heaped a lie upon a lie. That takes lying to a whole new level.