Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, the Altgens photo was  definitely altered, and it's the presence of the alterations, which we can see, that proves it.

The code you mentioned proves nothing. And Richard Trask was just a shill for the official story. The newspapers of the world most certainly did NOT get the Altgens photo at 1:03 PM. And, I didn't say that larger papers had better access, but they had larger staffs, more sophisticated and modern printers, and more resources in general to get things done. 

If every AP paper had it at 1:03, then they all would have published it- at least in their evening editions. But, the vast majority did not. I said: the vast majority of evening editions did not; very few did.  

And Backes, you are so fucking stupid about what I was referring to about "wasted space" it proves that the space between your ears is wasted. You are truly the dumbest pluck to ever venture into the realm of JFK. 

Then look what Backass said:

 "It (the FBI memo) merely states that the Altgens photo was published in SOME newspapers on Saturday."

But, that's not what it said. It said:

"Mr. Resch was familiar with the photo which he said was published in Saturday's papers."

You worthless piece of shit, where does it say SOME? It doesn't! Instead, it is a categorical statement -that is unqualified- and therefore, the implication is that it wasn't published until Saturday.

How different is that from what you said, you lying sack of shit?

Let's think this through. Altgens took his picture at 12:30. How quickly did he leave Dealey Plaza? We don't really know, but it seems unlikely that he left immediately because he was not only a photographer but also a journalist, and there was still newsworthy stuff going on. But whenever he left, according to Trask, he had to run on foot several blocks to the office of the  Dallas Morning News, where somebody grabbed his camera right away. 

Of course, the film had to be developed. Here is a description of all the steps involved:

http://www.ehow.com/how_1353_develop-black-white.html

Sounds pretty involved, doesn't it? It has to be developed and agitated, then put in the stop-bath and again agitated. Then it has to go through the fixer and be agitated for 15 seconds every minute for however long that takes. Then it says, "Remove the lid of the tank and run water into the tank for 15 minutes." And then it has to be dried. And how long does that take?

Considering all that was involved, does it seem physically possible for a photo snapped at 12:30 to be wired to the world at 1:03? 

And it wasn't just the technical process of developing the film- which can't be rushed. Obviously, the results had to be examined, right? Decisions had to be made about what to use and what not to use. And that's especially true for images that were being sent out to the whole freaking world. And apparently, the decision wasn't Altgens to make. It may not have been any one person's to make. They may have had several people go over the results and decide what to do with them, which meant discuss them. 

And since there was a caption involved that went with the picture, that caption had to be written. And you couldn't write it until you saw what the picture contained. 

If you were shown the Altgens photo for the first time, and in its raw form, without the digital enhancements we have today, how long would it take you to produce a caption for it? 

Again, considering all that and more, how likely is it that an image snapped at 12:30 was ready to be wired to the world at 1:03? It's a fucking joke; a fish story. 

But, we have this, which destroys the whole premise: 

Mr. Shapiro advised that immediately after this photograph was taken it was forwarded by wire to the Associated Press at New York, New York, and subsequently distributed to other AP offices throughout the country.

What about that don't understand, Backass? Paul Rigby was right. The Altgens6 was handled different from the others, and it was initially sent only to the AP itself and not to the fucking world, you moron.

Again, being a categorical and unqualified statement, the implication is that it went to the AP office in New York and then to other AP Offices and NOT to the world at large.  

I can't refute that the Altgens photo was on the AP wire at 1:03? I just did, Asshole. 

Let's remember something: THEY KILLED KENNEDY! THEY FRAMED OSWALD! THEY LIED ABOUT A GREAT MANY THINGS! And Joseph Backes admits to all that. He even thinks that a phony bus ride and cab ride were part of the vast scheme, a contrivance that required its own vast set of lies. Joseph Backes also claims the Warren Commission concocted long swathes of phony, fabricated testimony that was attributed to Billy Lovelady.

Yet, Backes thinks we should believe every word they said about the Altgens photo- like they wouldn't lie about that.

Let's turn this over to Jim Douglass. This is from JFK and the Unspeakable:

 We have advanced the knowledge about this since Jim Douglass wrote the above in 2007. Today, we know that there are indeed two arrows on CE 369. We found Lovelady's arrow, and it points to Black Hole Man. 

But, Jim Douglass was on the right track then in advocating for Oswald in the doorway. It is Oswald in the doorway, and notice that Jim pointed out that HE IS WEARING OSWALD'S CLOTHES!

The loose-fitting, substantially unbuttoned and sprawled open outer shirt over the exposed white t-shirt was Oswald's garb- nobody else's and certainly not Loveladys'.  

Fuck you, Backes! You can't stop this. You can't even slow it down. Unwittingly, you have only helped to advance it and draw more attention to it with your rants. So, keep it up, Backes. You too, bpete. With each passing day, more people come around to seeing Oswald in the doorway. And once they see it, they never go back.