Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Unger, why are you so damn stupid? You see something written about the JFK assassination, and you assume, automatically, that it's true? This is the JFK assassination we're talking about. 

I said: it concerns the JFK assassination. THE JFK ASSASSINATION! 

Ask your friend Joseph Backes how much was said and written about Oswald's bus ride and the cab ride and how much of it was false. Don't you understand that the whole thing was a web of lies?

And, read the above FBI memo again because you're not reading it correctly. It says that it started with the Dallas FBI Office identifying the questionable individual as Billy Lovelady. So, they made that identification- that Doorman was Lovelady- before they ever spoke to him. Then, they interviewed him at his home on 11/25/63, where they made a positive ID. Again, THEY made it.  It is written passively from Lovelady's standpoint.  Did he inform them that he was Doorman, or did they inform him of it? They didn't even state that "Lovelady identified himself as Doorman" rather, they said: "a positive ID had been made by interviewing Lovelady..." Yeah, by laying the law down to him: You were Doorman- or else. 

But, unfortunately for them, as scary as those big FBI agents were, their demands of Lovelady didn't take- not then. We know that because many months later, on April 7, 1964, Lovelady refused to say that he was Doorman. And what he said conflicted with what Frazier said. And when asked to draw an arrow to himself in the Altgens photo, he drew this:

   
Now, if you don't agree with that, feel free to submit what you think is Lovelady's arrow in CE 369. You're supposed to be the great JFK photo expert, and all I'm asking is a very simple thing: to find an arrow drawn on a photograph. How hard can it be?

But, that is the ONLY way out for you; it is the only option you've got: to find another arrow besides the one I found. And you can't use Frazier's arrow which is the big visible arrow that is drawn mostly in the white. From the testimony, we know for certain that that is Frazier's arrow, and just about everybody admits it now, including David Von Pein. 

Jim Douglass, in JFK and the Unspeakable, referred to Joseph Ball's sleazy interrogations- where he cleverly darted around the fact that Frazier and Lovelady were saying different things- as "tainted evidence." But, what is needed now is for someone to inform Jim Douglass that Lovelady's arrow has been found. The discovery of Lovelady's arrow proves beyond doubt that as late as April 1964, Lovelady did not want to lie. He knew the truth- that he wasn't Doorman- and he refused to say otherwise. 

And note that in the verbal exchange that he had with Joseph Ball, Lovelady NEVER said that he was Doorman. Of course, Ball never asked him directly: "Are you this Man in the Doorway?" He knew better than to do that. But, it was what he was intimating and driving at, but, Lovelady refused to be baited. He easily could have pointed to Doorman and said, "that's me." You think Ball would have minded? But, Lovelady didn't do it. And when it came time to draw an arrow to himself, he drew it to Black Hole Man.

So yes, there is a Crash, Bang, Pow going on, but I'm the one who is meting it out. And that brings me back to my original question: Why are you so damn stupid, Unger?