Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

That my adversaries refuse to admit that it's Oswald in the doorway comes down to nothing but pure childishness. They're like the little kid with crumbs all over his face who refuses to admit that he got into the cookie jar. 

I've presented numerous collages showing a compelling match between Oswald and Doorman- but it's not just their anatomical features that match, which they do very well, but also their clothing, the whole ensemble, the outer shirt and the way it is worn, and the exposed t-shirt and the way it is worn. It all matches- perfectly. 

And as I and others have pointed out, it is a mathematical thing. Those matches don't add up; they multiply. It's logarithmic. It takes the odds of Doorman being Oswald up to the stratosphere. They can't possibly not be the same man- not in this universe. 

And it's also like a toggle switch. It's not as though it could be Oswald or anyone: Man X. We start out knowing that it could be Oswald or Lovelady- and no one else. Therefore, the only logical response to my collages by my opponents is to provide collages of Doorman and Lovelady which match better- in the man and the clothing- than the ones of Doorman and Oswald. 

But, my enemies don't do that. Instead they do this:

1) They disparage me personally- and that's putting it mildly. In reality, it has been a non-stop, despicable, verbal assault and an extremely vulgar graphic assault against me.

2) They claim an impeccable timeline which made manipulation of the Altgens photo impossible. However, the likenesses between Doorman and Oswald don't depend on any manipulation of the photo. There are OTHER THINGS I point to that do, but not this. The central, core, fundamental reality that Doorman and Oswald match- in the man and the clothing- does not depend on the Altgens photo having been altered at all.  

3) They point to testimonies in the Warren Report which support the Lovelady claim. But, the Warren Report was the result of a highly controlled and contrived investigation. There was no way and no chance that the Commissioners would allow anyone to say that it was Oswald in the doorway. And, their response to anyone who tried to say it would have been to either revise the testimony OR throw it out completely OR refuse to take it in the first place. And who is to say that didn't happen? Was their any chance that they would publish such testimony? Was there any chance that someone's statement that Doorman was Oswald would be put into the Warren Report?  NO! There wasn't the slightest chance of that. Therefore, it's absence from the Warren Report means absolutely nothing.

4) They point to the HSCA investigation. However, the HSCA investigation relied upon Robert Groden who NEVER put an image of Oswald side by side with Doorman.  Groden only compared Doorman and Lovelady; he left Oswald out completely. If you were asked to determine which of two guys was a certain figure in a photograph, wouldn't you compare both of them to that figure? Groden didn't do that. Groden also failed to photograph Lovelady properly. He photographed him at his home in Denver instead of taking him to Dallas and photographing him in the doorway. Groden should have tried to duplicate the Altgens photo- in respect to Doorman- but he didn't have enough sense to do that. 

5) They also point to the other part of the HSCA investigation of this issue: the work of the HSCA anthropologists. However, those anthropologists only compared Oswald and Lovelady to each other, which made no sense. Comparing each of them to Doorman was the only thing that mattered. But, they didn't do that, blaming it on poor image quality. However, they "subjectively" made claims linking Lovelady to Doorman, meaning: "we can't measure it, but we can see it" and once they did that- once they opened that door- they were obliged to do the same for Oswald. But they didn't- not even recognizing the large elements of matching clothing between Oswald and Doorman, the matching builds, matching ears, and more. And some of their "subjective" claims about Lovelady and Doorman weren't even true; they don't hold up to scrutiny. They didn't show their work, but I will. For example, they claimed that Doorman's nose and chin matched to Lovelady. But, is it true?

  
In fact, Doorman's nose looks more chiseled and sculpted like Oswald's and less bulbous than Loveladys, and with larger nostrils, and his chin with a deep cleft is a match to Oswald and not to Lovelady's shallow chin.  

And although it went unmentioned by them, Doorman's right ear is a perfect match to Oswald, and that has to be why they didn't mention it. 

  
The anthropologists failed to demonstrate any of their claims--they just made them. It wasn't a presentation; it was just a decree. 

The bottom line is that the photographic evidence is screaming out loud that Oswald was Doorman, and the photographic evidence is the only thing that matters. 

Here are images of Oswald and Doorman which match very well. The only way to beat them is to provide images of Lovelady and Doorman that match better. All the rest is lip-flapping. Failure to do so is capitulation. I don't make the rules; reality does. I just enforce them. 

I'm here to tell you that the enemies of JFK truth are like little kids; evil, nasty little kids, and their evil is the only thing they've got going for them. 

Lee Harvey Oswald was the Man in the Doorway. And that is the undeniable, irrefutable, incontrovertible truth.