Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Bpete is now saying that Martin hadn't progressed enough for anything but his forearm to be captured in Mary's picture. He better check with Robin Unger because according to Robin, Martin was ahead of Mary, and more than his forearm.

You see that round white sphere in front of Mary? That's Martin's helmet. So how, at that moment, could she photograph just his forearm?

And even if it were possible, which it's not, how could she photograph just his right forearm and not his left forearm, when they were in the same plane?

This is very simple, and you don't have to be a Physics professor to understand it. Mary is on the grass to his left. As he approaches her and gets into her visual field, his left forearm gets there at the same time as his right forearm. If she's just shooting squarely at him from 90 degrees, she's going to catch both of them. And if she's behind him, meaning if he's passed her, she is going to catch much more of his left forearm than his right, and maybe not his right at all, since she is behind him and his body is blocking her view of his right forearm. 

So, this doesn't work in any way, not by the wildest stretches of imagination. 

Now: you listen up, Hondo the Wanderer. I'm tired of your stupid, lip-flapping blather. If you want to argue this further, you get out a camera and demonstrate it. I did it; now you do it. 

This is reality. This is the real world. My photographer captured my left arm, and as you can see, there is no way she could have captured my right arm alone and no other part of my body. That is nonsense. It is utter foolishness. It is insanity.