Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Can you see that Oswald's chin in the Backyard photo is too wide? It's massive. It's like a fucking anvil. Look at it up closer:

Can you see it now? What about you, Backes? Can you see it now? Still having trouble, eh? It figures. OK, let's try this:

Can you see it now, Backes? What???? You still can't see it? Jesus H. Christ, you are dense as a brick.

Take a fucking ruler to it, Backes, you bonehead. He's got a much more massive chin on the right. 

A lot of people have said that the Backyard Photo was altered. Do you know who was the first, Backes? It was Lee Harvey Oswald. When he was shown the Backyard photo, he said that they moved his face to another man's body. And he said that he could do it himself from having worked at a photo lab: Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall's right there in Dallas and not far from Dealey Plaza. And they did a lot of top secret work for the government, including the State Department and the CIA. They did the images of Cuba during the Cuban Missile Crisis. 

Oswald said it wasn't him, Backes. And if it wasn't him, then the photograph was definitely altered because it's definitely his face (except for the chin). 

Why would Oswald lie, Backes? There were no gun laws back then, and it wasn't a crime to own a rifle and a pistol or to be photographed holding them. You know he was innocent; you've said that. You've said that he was in the building at the time of the shots but you don't know where except that it was far from the 6th floor. So, being innocent, he had no reason to lie, right? Lying to the police has got to be the worst thing that an innocent person can do, right? Doesn't it make them look guilty? And why lie about a photo when it wasn't even a crime? It wasn't even a minor one. 

And a lot of people have agreed with Oswald that the photo was altered.  And the problem of the anvil chin isn't the only problem. Here is an excellent article about it by Jim Fetzer and Jim Marrs:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/08/19/framing-the-patsy-the-case-of-lee-harvey-oswald/ 

And of course, the guy who did the most work on this was Jack White. There are lots of videos on Youtube about the Backyard photo being fake, but here's one that features the great Jack White, a graphics expert:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qKVFgXPi-Gw

So, recognizing the Backyard photos as fake is not a Ralph Cinque thing. It isn't even an OIC thing. It is not even mentioned on our website. But, it is widely recognized and discussed within the JFK community and by some very important people. 

But, I want you to think about what it means. Oswald was shown that photo the day after the assassination. Since we know it was faked, it means that they were faking photos of him BEFORE the assassination. And if they were faking photos of him even before the assassination- if they had the mindset to do that- then how can you deny that they had the mindset to alter photos on the day of the assassination? 

Joseph Backes has denied ALL photographic and image alteration in the JFK assassination. He thinks that everything they've shown us is lily-white, as pure as the driven snow. 

But, if they altered the Backyard photos - and they did -  it means they had the means to do it; the motive to do it; and the mindset to do it. It means that it occurred to them: "Hey! We can alter photos to make the evidence conform to the lies that we're telling."

If they had that mindset, wouldn't it have occurred to them that images of JFK being shot from multiple directions might conflict with their story that Oswald was the sole assassin and therefore require doctoring? Therefore, wouldn't they have been prepared to confiscate photographs and films so as to fix them as needed? 

How many of the many JFK films and photos wound up in the hands of the government? That's the wrong question. The right one is: are there any that didn't?

If they altered the content, the information, the data from even one image from the JFK assassination, it veers the door wide open for Altgens photo alteration. Yet, there is widespread recognition within the JFK community of alteration of the Backyard photos, the Zapruder film, the autopsy photos, and the autopsy x-rays- to name four.

The Altgens photo was altered, just as surely as were the Backyard photos. And when I say altered, I don't mean just cropped. I mean that it was criminally altered to lie, to dissemble, and to deceive the American people and the world about what really happened on November 22, 1963.