"In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations also identified Lovelady after studying an enhanced version of the Altgens photograph and several amateur films.[35]
Ten years later, Texas journalist Jim Marrs wrote, "most researchers today are ready to concede that the man may have been Lovelady." In 2013, Marrs amended that statement, adding that "there is a growing resistance to this admission."[36]
Growing resistance? Who do you think Jim Marrs was referring to? He was referring to the Oswald Innocence Campaign. And he gave us excellent coverage in the updated version of Crossfire which came out in 2013.
Doorman is back! The issue isn't put to bed any more- far from it. It's not that it could be Oswald in the doorway; it's that it is obviously and definitely him. This is an image from Wikipedia:
Those are Oswald's clothes! Only Oswald was dressed like that! There is no chance that Lovelady wore a shirt like that, that laid like that, that hung like that. Are you crazy? Who could be wearing Oswald's clothes except Oswald? That outer shirt with the form of a jacket and the gaping opening was uniquely Oswald's.
And by the way, Backass, I never said they used the FBI photo to fix Doorman's hairline. I said they used the image of Young Lovelady from the 1950s.
The above photo of Lovelady wasn't released at the time of the assassination, but that doesn't mean authorities didn't have it. It wasn't released publicly until 1979 with the HSCA Final Report, but that doesn't mean the FBI and CIA didn't have it in 1963. In all probability, it was obtained from Billy Lovelady's Air Force file. And they used it to give Doorman a new hairline.
The Evil Backes keeps misrepresenting my positions, the fat, lazy, slow-witted bastard. He's got more chins than a Chinese phonebook.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.