Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Keep it up, Backes. Everyone knows that you are a fake CT. You are the poster boy for the bizarre world of fake CTs.

Backes is also the idiot who thinks that a big elaborate and theatrical tale of Oswald's transportation was concocted the very afternoon of the assassination by Dallas Police, involving phony witnesses, phony evidence, and more, and yet, he refuses to consider that Danny Arce may have lied about his age. His affidavit says that he was white, male, and 18.

w/m/18 White, male and 18. Right? Well, was he white?

Backass complained that I compared him to two white 18 year olds. So, even the evil God-damn proscenim-stuffer admits he wasn't white. Yet, it says white, which was wrong. Maybe the 18 was wrong too.

Mark Valenti posted the following on Education Forum:

On November 3, 1995, the FBI released some files to NARA which it had held back for one reason or another. 

This came at a time when, due to the JFK Assassination Records Act, the CIA and other governmental bodies also were releasing previously secret documents.

Among the newly released FBI documents were files on: 

James Angleton
Morris Block, a Russian defector
Ronnie Caire and Frank DeLa Barre, both involved in the anti-Castro movement
Martin Fox, owner of a nightclub in Cuba
QJ/WIN
The Anti-Communist International Brigade
Thomas Edward Beckham, friend of Ferrie and involved in anti-Castro activities
AND>>>>>>Danny Arce. 

So, why the hell did the FBI have a secret file on Danny Arce? And by the way, the emphasis above was by Mark Valenti, not me. So, even he was shocked that such a file should exist.

Because Danny Arce was just a regular, ordinary 18 year old Dallasite who happened to work at the TSBD. Right? Isn't that what Joseph Backes wants you to believe?

Backes, why do you call yourself a CT? You are NOT a CT. You are a LN, a lying LN. You're a LLN. That's what you are.

And here is how the great Jack White responded to that:

Does anyone have this document?

Jack 

What a contrast to Backes, eh? You think maybe Jack White had a different attitude, a different mindset than the Proscenium-stuffer?

Danny Arce lied under oath. He said Doorman was Billy Lovelady, but he had to know better. Arce saw them both that morning and worked with them both that morning. He saw how they were dressed. Doorman looks gaunt and slender- like Oswald- not husky like Lovelady was at the time. Joseph Ball asked Danny Arce directly who Doorman was, which was something he did not do with Billy Lovelady. Why was Ball tepid with Lovelady- cautious to the extreme, making him respond non-verbally by drawing an arrow. Draw an arrow to yourself in the photo? DRAW A FUCKING ARROW TO YOURSELF IN THE PHOTO? Who does that? Who proceeds that way? Why didn't Ball just ask Lovelady the way he asked Arce?

Mr. BALL. Just 1 minute, I want to show you a picture. I show you Commission Exhibit No. 369. I show you this picture. See this man in this picture?
Mr. ARCE. Yeah.
Mr. BALL. Recognize him?
Mr. ARCE. Yes, that's Billy Lovelady.
Mr. BALL. Just to identify it clearly, the man on the steps---well, you see the man on the steps, do you not?
Mr. ARCE. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. He is a white man, isn't he?
Mr. ARCE. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. And you see his picture just above the picture of two colored people, is that correct; would you describe it like that?
Mr. ARCE. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. I am not going to mark this purposely because other witnesses have to see it.
Mr. ARCE. Yes.
Mr. BALL. Did you say that is Billy Lovelady? 
Mr. ARCE. Yes, that is Billy Lovelady.
Mr. BALL. Now, there is only one face that is clearly shown within the entrance-way of the Texas School Book Depository Building, isn't there? 
Mr. ARCE. Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL. And only one face of a person who is standing on the steps of the Depository Building entrance?
Mr. ARCE. Yeah. Mr. BALL. And that one man you see there---
Mr. ARCE. Yes, that's Billy Lovelady.

Why was Ball so direct with Arce? He was leading him through the questioning like he was Arce's own lawyer doing something they rehearsed. Where did that confidence come from? Why did Ball feel safe enough with Arce to just point to Doorman and ask, "Recognize him?" Why didn't he do exactly the same with Lovelady? Why with Lovelady was it instead, "Draw an arrow to yourself."

What the fuck? Since Ball presumed that Doorman was Lovelady, who was going to be better at recognizing Lovelady than Lovelady? Why didn't he just ask Lovelady directly the way he asked Arce?

Now compare the dates: Lovelady was interviewed by Joseph Ball on April 7, 1964 at 2:15 PM, while Danny Arce was interviewed by Joseph ball on April 7, 1964 at 3:50 PM. IT WAS THE SAME FUCKING DAY, JUST AN HOUR AND A HALF APART!

So, after playing that fucking game with Lovelady having him draw an arrow, and never asking him directly if he was Doorman, and never pointing out and distinguishing Doorman the way he did later with Arce, that shortly afterwards, Ball rolled up his sleeves and went straight for the jugular with Arce. He honed right in: the one and only male face that you can see in the doorway, above the two "colored" persons, distinguishing him as white, letting the whole world know that they were talking about the Man in the Doorway, and that the man was Lovelady. So, why did Ball play footsie about it with Lovelady just an hour and a half earlier? Why didn't he approach it the same way with both of them?

Mr. BALL - I have got a picture here, Commission Exhibit 369. Are you on that picture?
Mr. LOVELADY - Yes, sir.
Mr. BALL - Take a pen or pencil and mark an arrow where you are.
Mr. LOVELADY - Where I thought the shots are?
Mr. BALL - No; you in the picture.
Mr. LOVELADY - Oh, here (indicating).
Mr. BALL - Draw an arrow down to that; do it in the dark. You got an arrow in the dark and one in the white pointing toward you. Where were you when the picture was taken?
   
But, that vast difference in approach on the very same day between the two men doesn't bother you at all, does it Backes? You'll defend Arce, won't you? You'll defend Joseph Ball, won't you? You'll defend Will Fritz for lying about what Oswald said he was doing at the time of the assassination, won't you? You filthy, dirty, blood-soaked Kennedy-killing bastard; that is what you are, Backes.

But, keep it up about Arce, Backass. Keep defending him. Let's keep arguing about this. Because we have raised more questions and more suspicions about Danny Arce than have ever been raised before in 50 years. Do a search for Danny Arce JFK on Google. This blog shows up on the 2nd page. My Facebook page shows up on the 4th page. Your stupid hate site doesn't show up at all; but still, you're helping me get the word out about this, and a lot has been accomplished in the last few days. So keep it up; we're talking Danny Arce.