Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Forget it, Backass. As I said, you can't take it back. You referred to the ones who allege Oswald as Prayer Man as honest researchers.  And you implied that they may be right. You said that it would be huge if it proved to be true. And you didn't act the least bit upset about it, like it wouldn't bother you at all if Prayer Man turned out to be Oswald. You acted totally sympathetic to the idea of it as a possibility. You weren't closed to it at all.  

The bottom line is that you showed a totally open mind to the idea that Prayer Man was Oswald. For some reason, the very idea of it does not upset you the way Oswald as Doorman upsets you. Listen up, Backass: the contrast in your ATTITUDE towards Ozzie Prayer Man versus Ozzie Doorman COULD NOT HAVE BEEN GREATER. It was polar opposite, you dirty rotten proscenium stuffer, and DON'T YOU DENY IT.

But now, let's think about the implications of it. First, if Oswald was Prayer Man, then he was in the doorway during the shooting, and therefore, he was not up on the 6th floor "locking and loading" and firing rounds into Kennedy. In other words, you completely pulled the rug out from under your buddy bpete.

The plain truth is that bpete is just as torpedoed by Oswald as Prayer Man as he is by Oswald as Doorman. It wrecks his case just as much. And the same as true of others like bpete, which includes all the LNs and all the HSCA CTs.

Second, if Oswald was Prayer Man it completely vindicates and validates "out with Bill Shelley in front". That's because Shelley claimed to be back in the shadows, and I mean awfully close to where we see Prayer Man. So, if Prayer Man was Oswald, then it legitimizes "out with Bill Shelley in front" a lot. Not that is needs legitimizing because it is legitimate, but I simply mean that it's going to force all the KK mouthpieces to shut the fuck up about it.

Third, Oswald as Prayer Man will establish Will Fritz and others as liars. Fritz told the WC that Oswald told him he was "eating lunch with other employees" at the time of the shooting. That, of course, is impossible. But, if Oswald was Prayer Man, it spotlights the lie to where no one can deny it. Moreover, it makes liars out of other people, like Bill Shelley, who said that he didn't see Oswald between 11:45 and whenever he saw him at the Dallas PD. But, if Oswald was Prayer Man who was back in the shadows PRESUMABLY WITH SHELLEY, how could Shelley not have seen him?

Now, you, Backes, probably didn't think about those things when you played footsie with the Prayer Man idea- being the dumb fuck that you are. And you also didn't think about the rashness of bursting a bile duct over Oswald as Doorman but acting perfectly calm and serene about Oswald as Prayer Man- a guy who was standing just 3 feet away from Doorman. Backes, you were RESPECTFUL to the idea of Oswald as Prayer Man- AND DON'T TRY TO DENY IT. Furthermore, YOU CAN'T TAKE IT BACK. And you want to know why you can't take it back? It's because I, Ralph Cinque, won't let you. I am going to post the following every time from now on.

Now, I will say again that I think it's mad to choose Prayer Man as Oswald's alter ego because it is Doorman who is wearing Oswald's clothes.

   And when we compare the clothes alone, it's startling good:

It's the same fucking clothes, you dumb fuck! You have to be out of your mind not to see it and admit it.

Nevertheless, it remains true that the Prayer Man devotees are getting to the same bottom line that we are, which is: Oswald in the doorway. They are trashing the WC version of events and the HSCA version of events as much as we are. So, although I don't consider them my brethren, they are advocating something similar to us, and they are acting on some of the same premises that we are.

So, as I said, Backes: you gave away half the farm, and you're not getting it back. You will forever be remembered as the lunatic who had a grand mal seizure over Oswald as Doorman but showed kind respect to the advocates of Oswald as Prayer Man- who was just 3 feet away.  

Now, on a different note, it was a beautiful day today in Austin, Texas, and Linda and I had a friend visiting from out of town whom we took around. And one of the places we went to was the Mayfield House, which is a very old estate with beautiful gardens and water lily ponds and colorful peacocks. And they have an outdoor wedding site where outdoor wedding ceremonies are held that includes this arch. And they refer to it as the Wedding Arch.

   

They call it an arch for a reason, Backes, and the reason is that it is arched or curved. That's what makes it an arch. Arches are arched- you dumb fuck. Now, get used to seeing this because you're going to be seeing it a lot: