Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

There is a guy who goes by Jack Jackson who has a webpage against me concerning the phony Woman and Boy in the Altgens6 photo. He disputes my claim. But, he doesn't do so effectively. And, one would have to be pretty damn stupid to be impressed by his crap. 

But, he starts off by agreeing with me about one thing: that the Towner Woman and Baby are not the same persons as the Altgens Mother and Boy.

"I question Robin Unger's position that they are the same Woman/Child because the two couples are dressed in different colored clothing. The Altgens6 Woman is clearly dressed in a white/light colored outfit. The Towner Woman above is seen in a dark/black colored outfit. How does one reconcile that glaring discrepancy?"

So, he made a good start. But, why stop with what he said? How about the age difference? Isn't it obvious that the child on the right is a baby while the child on the left is not? Let's put some numbers to it: The child on the right is less than 1. But, look how small its head is. That kid has got microcephaly. Compare the proportion between the size of the baby's head on the right to its mother, on the one hand, to the size of the boy's head to his mother's on the left. And remember: he has got head filling up that hat. His head is almost as big as hers! Yet on the right, the mother has got a giant head that is many times bigger than the baby's. 

And you see, the problem is that people are ignorant. When a person waves, it isn't just a flicking of the wrist. You are not stationary except for your hand. Your whole upper extremity is involved in the waving.  It certainly isn't going to look like this:

If you look at that closely, you see that there is this flicking hand above her head, and otherwise, she is as still as a statue and so is the baby. It is fake. 

But then, when Jackson looks at it as a still frame, the moron decides that there are 3 people there: He mistakes the flicking hand for another person:

So now, EVEN THOUGH IT IS THE SAME IMAGE, he has decided that the baby is the woman, and the flicking hand (which can't flick in a still photo) is the child, and he says that there is a third body there, pointing to the mother. The stupidity of that is staggering. How could anybody be that dumb?

I am not going to go any further with his Towner analysis because it's just too inane. It's not worth spending the time. I don't know who Jack Jackson is or if it's his real name, but, I do know that he is a blithering idiot. 

The bottom line is that the Altgens Woman and Boy are an impossible image because he it too high up, and he is too erect to be standing on anything but solid ground. And he is not being held because she can't be holding him; not like that. She would have to be Superwoman. But, I will say this for them: they both appear to be photographic. So, they did exist somewhere. It must have been a cold spot since he's got a wool cap not only on his head but pulled down over his ears. Who would do that on a sunny 70+ degree afternoon? And don't tell me it was cool and rainy in the morning, Backes, because when it warms up, you take your fucking hat off. 

And, the Towner Woman and Baby are completely, totally fake. They did not exist- anywhere. They were made up. They are techno-art.

How is the Towner mother holding and supporting the baby? It looks like her left arm is going over below, but that's Photoshop fakery. SHE WAS WAVING AT THE PRESIDENT WITH HER LEFT ARM. Remember?

So, her left hand is above her head. So, what we're seeing here is bull shit:

Notice that it looks like she has a bald spot on top of her head, but that's just the remnant of the flicking left hand. So, her left arm is out of the running. It can't be supporting the baby. All that leaves is her right arm. But, where is it? We don't see it. Shouldn't it be going around the baby? And shouldn't it be visible? What is keeping that baby from falling away from her? Nothing is. And notice that the baby has no form. No distinguishable arms. No distinguishable legs. Nothing except a micro-head and a blob for a torso. It is crude, despicable, bloodied JFK techno-art.