Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

bigdog

1:10 PM (1 hour ago)

On Wednesday, September 27, 2017 at 11:47:46 PM UTC-4, Ralph Cinque wrote: 

- show quoted text -

Ralph, you have unwittingly made an excellent argument why it was Oswald.
You have pointed out all the different entities that would have had to
conspire against Oswald and are correct that the no one outside the
government could have marshalled all those forces. Your fallacy is in
failing to realize that nobody inside the government could have done it
either. The government is not monolithic. It doesn't act as one. We have
federal, state, and local governments. Within each of those government
entities are departments and the departments all have their own agendas.
The federal government has three branches. Within the executive branch we
have numerous departments. It would have required collusion among the
Treasury, Defense, and Justice departments, the latter of which was headed
by JFK's brother. On the local level, both the DPD and the Dallas
sheriff's department took part in investigating the crime and gathering
the evidence. During the WC investigation, the New York City fingerprint
department and the Illinois state crime lab were called in to render
second opinions regarding key pieces of forensic evidence. There was
nobody in the country, not then and not now who was in a position to have
brought all those various entities into a conspiracy and cover up in order
to frame Oswald. Bugliosi said it best. Either Oswald killed JFK or
hundreds of people conspired to make it look like he did. I find the
latter to be a ludicrous proposition. 

Ralph Cinque: 

You are being very naive, James Corbett. The fact is that once it went down, that all the dominoes fell into place for all the minions in government, at all levels, and media to support the official story. It was like a title wave. Like a tsunami. There was no resisting it. There was no opposing it. And no one in government did. Just think: not even Robert Kennedy did. If anyone could be expected to oppose it, it was him. But, he didn't. And, it's not because he believed the story. It's not because he accepted it. It's because he recognized the stakes involved in fighting it, which meant going total pariah, total expatriot, total and complete outcast. And, he just wasn't willing to do it, regrettably. And, he set the example. If he had stood up to them, then maybe others in JFK's inner circle would have, especially his so-called "Irish Mafia". But, they took their cue from RFK, and RFK cowered; he conceded; he relented. He just didn't have the courage to do it. 

We have been in a fascist system for a long time, including back then, and a fascist system is run very much top-down. And especially in a national emergency, which this was, it is run extremely top-down. And it means that the "pacemaker" to make an analogy to the human heart is the "national security state." And all the wiring was in place to make the acceptance of the official story absolute at all levels of government, in the corporate world, and especially in the media. So, the current spread  through the organism of Society in a way that was smooth, synchronous, coordinated, and uninterrupted- much like current passes through the heart. And, it's scary when you think about it. It's scary to think that such a beast exists.