Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Now, the Proscenium Stuffer is saying that the reason why Psychedelic Lovelady looks the way he does is because of the copying process. He claims to know that it's a bad copy that was not made from the camera original or a first generation copy. 

There is no way copying alone could do this. Remember that we know exactly what the shirt pattern was because Lovelady, supposedly, posed in the very same shirt for Robert Groden. 

So, the shirt on the right is the actual shirt that supposedly got photographed on 11/22/63. There is no way it could ever morphed into what we see on the left from the copying process. 

And what the blithering idiot doesn't realize is that the wear and tear of copying causes colors to wash out- not become more intense. How could the copying process cause deep inky blue to appear in a shirt which had no such color? The colors we see on the left were added to the image. It was colorized!

And could the wear and tear of copying cause bulging muscles to appear in his arm? And his neck to turn pink? Copying doesn't cause colors to run. However, colorizing can result in colors running. 

You say that amateurs were making copies galore in the 1960s and 1970s? Well then show me other JFK images they copied that turned "psychedelic" because of the copying process.  

Backes, you are a disgusting spectacle of evil and stupidity, and you better hope we never meet because I won't be civil.