Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Bozo the Clown on McAdams forum posted this collage as visual evidence that Doorman was Lovelady. 

First note that the clothes don't match at all. Doorman is wearing a long-sleeved shirt that was unbuttoned and sprawled open over a notched white t-shirt. Lovelady's t-shirt is round; his shirt was short-sleeved, and his shirt pattern was striped. Those are the clothes he claimed to have worn on 11/22/63, which is why they photographed him wearing them. But, they obviously don't match Doorman. 

So, the clothes, which comprise about 80 percent of Doorman's image, are a complete disconnect to this image of Lovelady. What about the face? Let's hone in:

Lovelady has a more pointed chin. Doorman has more flare to his nostril. Lovelady has more space between his eyes and his eyebrows. The only thing that matches well are the hairlines. But, the problem is that Mark Lane took a photo of Lovelady about the same time in 1964.

Do you see how he was a lot balder? Here's another image:

Lovelady was much balder at the time of the assassination. So, they faked his hairline in the FBI photo which Bozo submitted.

Here's a thought, Bozo: it's probably better not to use staged photos of Lovelady in which he was dressing and posing in an effort to look like Doorman. Better to go with a spontaneous photo. And we have one from the day of the assassination. In fact, it's just minutes after the shooting. And that way, we get to factor in the clothes too.

It doesn't work, Bozo. It isn't him. It was Oswald in the doorway.