Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Check your mailing list, Burnham. You'll find an address that consists of oswaldinnocent. That's me. And you sent me the announcement about your new forum, the rules, the policies, how to participate, etc. I was surprised, myself, to get that from you, but I did. I don't say that it was a personal invitation. I was simply on the list of people you sent that too, and to me, it sounded like an invitation- to everybody. 

But, as significant as that is, it's nothing compared to your hypocrisy in engaging in photo analysis of Zapruder and Wiegman and Hughes and other JFK imagery on your Photo and Film Subforum, but when I wanted to talk about the Towner film, you started in right away citing all your techno-babble about the compressions and the deficient browsers, etc. Not a word about those things to the others- only to me.

And the irony is that the images to which I was referring were both directly from ROBIN UNGER. That's where they came from. 

Burnham, you're a funny guy. You have just enough education to sound a little academic, and a times, even lofty.  But it's all a facade. You have no intelligence.  You have no ability to reason. And you are completely blind to your own contradictions, such as condemning JFK photo analysis in comprehensive terms and then, in another breath, getting deeply steeped in it. It's like you wake up in a whole different world every morning. 

I'll tell you something, Burnham: it's Oswald in the doorway, and we know that now beyond any doubt. The guy is wearing Oswald's clothes. He has Oswald's build. He has Oswald's facial features, except his hairline and the top of his head. He has Oswald's stance, clasping his hands, left over right. 

You can wax on and on with your technobabble, but the images are decisive, and they say it's Oswald in the doorway. There is no deficiency with the images. The deficiency is with you.