Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is a new chart by Richard Hooke. He calls it Oswald by a chin, but he could just as easily have called it Oswald by a nose. 

Oswald had larger nostrils that were more flared and more exposed. The result was that the dark space of the nostril was more pronounced. On Doorman, since Altgens was well west of him, we're seeing mainly the west side of his nose, that is, his right nostril, which is left to us. But, that long, dark area would never have been that big were it Lovelady. Lovelady's nostrils just didn't stand out as much. They were more closed up. Oswald was like a race horse that way. Look at the images on the right where you can compare Lovelady's nose to Oswald's, and particularly their nostrils. How much bigger are Oswald's nostrils? Twice as big? That's what I'd say. Then, when you look back at Doorman, you see that the match is to Oswald. 

The chin and the ear were the first matches to Oswald that were made, and by Richard. It was quite a bit later that the matches to Oswald's eyes and nose were made. Doorman's whole face from the eyes down is match to Oswald. And what it leaves is nothing but the hairline and the top of the head that are a match to Lovelady.

To get a clear idea about the shape of Doorman's head, it will help to flood the image with light:

You can see how round and oval and smooth the shape of his head was. But that was not true of Oswald's head. 

You're not seeing that peaked, geometric shape at the top of the head on Doorman as you do on Oswald. Plus, Doorman's hair looks shorter and more receded. There just isn't any match there in the area of the "cap" between the two. 

So, from his eyes all the way down through his face and torso, including his clothes, Doorman is a match to Oswald. But at the top of his head, including his hairline, he is a match to Young Lovelady. Not Lovelady from the time of the assassination but from when he was much younger, in the 1950s.

These are the facts, and there are no techno-babble arguments to dispute them.