Sunday, April 13, 2014

This is personal to Barry Ernest.

Barry, you posted the signed statement of Billy and Patricia Lovelady claiming that he was Doorman as if it means something. It does not. 

It is undeniably true that Lovelady, eventually, came around to claiming to be Doorman. But, so what? For the first six months, he didn't. In April 1964, which was 5 months after the assassination, he drew an arrow to Black Hole Man to indicate himself. 


There is nothing else that can be except the tail of Lovelady's arrow. It is not a scratch or artifact. It is a discreet line, drawn by a person, Billy Lovelady.

And I should tell you that we, that is Richard Hooke, figured out that that was Lovelady before the arrow was discovered. This is just a confirmation. 

Billy Lovelady wore a short-sleeved shirt on 11/22, as you can also see here.


And that's why Lovelady posed in a short-sleeved shirt for the FBI in February 1964.



So much for him trying to claim to be Doorman. That didn't start for him until May 1964- 6 months after the shooting. 

And here is a person of prominence who agreed with this analysis: Harold Weisberg. Just read through his deposition with Jim Garrison in New Orleans. He also went into it in Photographic Whitewash. 

Robert Groden sold out. He was hired by the HSCA. They paid him money, and I mean good money. Why do you think they hired him? Do you think it was to do an impartial investigation of the Doorman question and let the chips fall where they may? Do you really think that is how it was? They were no more going to do an impartial investigation of the Doorman question than they were going to do an impartial investigation of the Vickey Adams question. 

What I am telling you is that, in so many words, they asked him at the beginning whether he could find for Lovelady, and he told them that he could, and that is why they hired him. There is no way they would have hired him otherwise. And if at any time they saw that he was leaning towards finding for Oswald, they would have canned his ass right away.

Don't you understand that the HSCA was just another whitewash? It was Warren Commision II. Sure, they tweaked the story a little: Oswald did it in all respects but he may have had an accomplice on the Grassy Knoll who missed. 

Barry, that is such bull shit. They were just throwing the conspiracy community a bone. And they were quick to say that they didn't suspect the CIA or FBI, but rather: the Mafia. 

Barry, the Mafia couldn't change the parade route. The Mafia couldn't control the press. And worst of all, the Mafia would never have chosen Lee Harvey Oswald to be a shooter. He was no marksman! He practically failed his final shooting test as a Marine. One point less and he would have. And the only shooting he did post-Marines was to go hunting a few times in Russia WITH A SHOTGUN! The idea that they would have put a rifle in Oswald's hands and had him start shooting in the direction of Jackie and Nellie and others they didn't want hurt is ridiculous. 

Barry, I refer to "HSCA CTs" as examples of phony CTs who are really just apologists for the official story. The HSCA was a joke. They didn't even look into all the mysterious deaths of the witnesses who were dropping like flies during the proceedings, including Billy Lovelady. 

Barry, this piece of work of yours below is pure bull shit:



Barry, the signed note means nothing, and the image of the Lovelady impostor means nothing. That guy wasn't Doorman, and he wasn't even Lovelady. 



Barry, I want you to look real hard at something. Do you notice on the left that Doorman's shirt is sprawled open widely? It's parted like the Red Sea, right? Well, look at the Lovelady figure. Can you see that he is NOT sprawled open? They were different men, Barry. Furthermore, how could that skinny guy on the left be the brawny guy on the right?

Barry, would you please think smarter? I am begging you. There is no excuse for that kind of lazy, sloppy thinking. That guy on the right was NOT Doorman, and he was not even Lovelady. These are two different men:


 Anyone who can't see that they are two different men is either lying or deluded. 

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.