Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Geez, this guy is stupid. Backes said: "Here's the optical illusion" and he was talking about this:

It's not an illusion, Backes. Do you even know what the word "illusion" means?

An illusion is defined as: "something that deceives by producing a false or misleading impression of reality."

So, what's the deception, Backes? We're looking at something from two different angles. So, what's the false impression of reality? They are both true impressions of reality. We're looking at objects photographed from opposite sides. That's all it is. There is no deception involved. 

And in both cases. the distance between the tomatoes and the flashlight is the same. If the distance appeared to change, even though nothing was moved, THAT would be an illusion. That would give a false impression. It would give the impression that something was moved when it hadn't been. But, in this case, we know that nothing was moved, that the photographer just swung around in an arc around the table to take the pictures. Big deal. Anyone with an IQ above 50 can see what took place, so I don't know what the hell your problem is. I know you're stupid, but are you that stupid?