Oswald concealed his rifle, when he lied to co worker Frazier about ''curtain rods'' on November 21, 22, 1963.
No one ever came forward in defense-or otherwise-of Oswald, saying that he came to them about renting an apartment, or house, as some people have suggested.
The whole story about ''curtain rods'' is nonsense.
Upon what was he planning to hang them, and hang them with? A person needs the fixtures--nails, and the two rod holders--to nail into the wall, to hold the curtain rods. Where was Oswald's hammer, nails, plus the fixtures?
Had he discussed hanging ''curtain rods'' with his landlady? If he was planning to hang these without the permission of his landlady, certainly he would not ask her to borrow a hammer.
Would a person want to hang curtains in a room that already had curtains, plus blinds?
If, as some say in his defense, the room didn't have curtains until after the assassination, then, please, by all means, explain to us where the hammer, nails, and fixtures are, that he was going to use to hang the "curtain rods" with.
The rooming house sat somewhat off the road, therefore eliminating the excuse that ''light'' was probably getting into the room during the night, as one person contends.
What was he going to put onto the "curtain rods"?
Had he purchased curtains? Has anyone ever come forward and mentioned Oswald purchasing curtains? Did the Oswald's own their own curtains? If so, why did Oswald also not take curtains with him to work 11-22-63, when he left the Paine home, along with the ''curtain rods"?
Oswald was so concerned with his ''curtain rods''. Why, then, didn't he take them with him when he departed the depsitory, after the shooting?
Where were/are the curtains?
"If Oswald already had his own curtains, why did he not also carry them with him to the rooming house? "
The reply to my question was:
"Maybe that is where Oswald was headed after leaving his rooming house. To buy curtains."
If that were true, upon what, would he hang them? He didn't take the ''curtain rods'' with him when he departed the despository building, after the assassination. He therefore had no ''curtain rods'' on which to hang curtains.
Oswald was *concerned* with his ''curtain rods'' so much so that he went to all the trouble of wrapping them in paper. Why, then, didn't he take them with him when he departed the depository building?
I guess we now know why Oswald took his pistol with him when he left the rooming house. He was going to use it to hold up the store clerk, so he could steal curtains to hang upon the ''curtain rods'' that he went to all the trouble to transport from Dallas to Irving, but conveniently forgot to take with him, back to his rooming house after he left work for the day.
Ralph Cinque:Barber, are you completely out of your mind? Oswald denied ever saying anything about curtain rods. And that makes all those problems you are citing about the curtain rods non-existent. The only question is: who was lying, and who was telling the truth? Frazier or Oswald?
Here's an idea: Oswald never said it, and Frazier never heard it. It was just words they put in Frazier's mouth, and eventually, they stuck in his head.
Frazier said that they threatened him, and they threatened his family. And he was a 19 year old boy.
Who would try to pass a Mannlicher-Carcano rifle off as curtain rods?
Barber asks what happened to the curtain rods, but it's a ridiculous question because Oswald said he took only his lunch to work, and Marina confirmed it.
Barber, where do you get off just presuming that Oswald was the one lying and Frazier was the one telling the truth? You make that presumption, and you also presume that everyone else has to make it. Well, we don't have to make it, and we do not make it.
This doesn't come down to where were the curtains and where were the tools, you stupid idiot. It comes down to who was lying and who was telling the truth. I believe Oswald.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.