Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I'm sure James K. Lambert was very particular about which CT he featured in his trailer. And, I am not saying that to criticize the young man that he featured. I agree with everything he said. But, the plain truth is that talking about Johnson's motives for killing Kennedy and JFK's battle with the Federal Reserve as another motive has the ring of paranoia regardless of who says it. It screams Conspiracy with a capital C.  

But, what I would have said instead was that Oswald could not have killed Kennedy because he was standing outside in the doorway at the time. 

And again, I'm not saying that the other is paranoia, only that it can easily be construed as paranoia. But, this thing about Doorman isn't paranoia on any basis. This is just vision, meaning what you do with your eyes. Your vision and your focused mind are telling you that Oswald was outside, and therefore, he could not have been on the 6th floor. It's the same clothes, and the only one who dressed that way was Oswald. Lovelady wasn't dressed like that. It's Oswald's slender build. It's the shape of Oswald's face. And, it's the same stance of clasping his hands together in front, left over right. That was Oswald's stance; it wasn't Lovelady's. We have multiple pictures of Oswald doing that, including at the last moment of his conscious life when Jack Ruby shot him. 

This isn't about interpreting. It's not about inferring anything. It's about seeing something and recognizing it. Oswald was standing in the doorway, and that wraps up the whole case. It is checkmate.