The point is, Backass, that if that Fedora Man had been there in front of the Obelisk for Altgens, as he was for Towner, that Altgens would have seen him there, just as Towner did. Altgens would have seen him there; he would have photographed him there; and the man would have appeared in that spot in the photograph.
Your bull shit parallax theory makes no sense. I don't say that parallax doesn't exist; it just doesn't exist here. It applies in some cases- in many cases- but not in this case. The man was too close to that Obelisk to be separated from it photographically.
Furthermore, Towner and Altgens were shooting from the SAME side of Elm. he was just down the street a ways; that's all. They were both on the opposite side of the street as the man and the Obelisk.
Some days ago I made an analogy to the idea that he could have had a lasso around that Obelisk and been holding the short end of the rope. How would you separate them in the picture then? How would you go about lengthening that rope? The fact that he didn't have a lasso doesn't matter. He could have. The laws of physics are the same whether he did or he didn't.
That argument totally defeated you, Dipshit. You're just too stupid to know when you've been trounced.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.