Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Joseph Backes is one dumb fuck. After claiming that there was an "optical illusion" involved in this gif

I pointed out to him that that isn't true, that there is no false information, that everything makes perfect sense between the two images which were simply taken from two different angles, and there are absolutely no misleading impressions. None. 

What was his retort to that? Nothing. He just moved on to something else. 

And this has happened time and again, and it's because he was born stupid, and he's going to stay that way. He's an idiot. 

Now, he says that since I claim that the Mother and Boy weren't really there in Altgens that there is no reason why the Mother and Baby in Towner couldn't be there since I claim they were different people. Since, they were different people, why couldn't one set be real and the other false? 

It's because they're in the same space. It's because both Altgens and Towner captured that same space. If the Altgens set was fake and the Towner set was real, then the Towner set should be seen in Altgens, along with the fake set that was added. I'm not claiming that the alterers removed the Towner set from Altgens and then installed the Woman and Boy. That makes no sense. If they had a Woman and Baby in that spot, why replace them with a Woman and Boy? The Woman and Baby would have worked just fine. There was no need to do that; it's preposterous. 

So, the Woman and Boy were added to Altgens precisely because there was nobody there- except for that Fedora Man. And he happened to be Jack Ruby, and he happened to be turned and looking at Lee Harvey Oswald in the doorway right as the President was riding by, which is weird, and that is why they added the Woman and Boy to the photo.

So, they inserted the Woman and Boy in Altgens to cover up and defuse the aberration of Jack Ruby being turned and looking at Oswald. And they installed the Woman and Baby in Towner in order to authenticate what they had done in Altgens with the Woman and Boy. 

Why did they replace a Woman and Boy with a Woman and Baby? Well, they didn't think it would matter. It was easier. This was techno-art, and the baby could be depicted as two blobs. You can't depict a boy as two blobs. 

 And they didn't expect that anyone would notice. And, it goes to show that we don't always get what we expect in life. Somebody did notice. Ralph Cinque noticed. 

They're not the same, Backes. The boy on the left is 3 years old. The baby on the right can't be more than 1. The woman on the left is wearing a light scarf over a light top. The woman on the right is dressed in black. The woman on the left has her hair pulled back and it is not falling down her shoulders. The woman on the right has her hair falling down over her shoulders and back. The woman on the right isn't even real. She seems to be using her left arm to hold the baby, but we know she isn't because she's using it to wave at the President- unceasingly. And, she's not using her right arm to hold the baby either. So, there is nothing supporting that baby. That baby is just levitating- defying gravity. It's a bogus image. The Towner Mother and Baby are a totally bogus image: they are techno-art. 

All of the online versions of the Towner film fail to show the Woman and Baby meaningfully. What I mean is that if you showed the film to unprepped viewers who knew nothing and then asked them about it, the vast majority would probably not recognize them, just as Edward Baker didn't. Here, he installed a symbolic mother and baby right next to them without even realizing that they were there.  

Backes complains that I don't want to use the better version of the film. Well, I do, except that I want it to be authentic. I don't want to use something that was photoshopped like this:

And it's because I want to view the Towner film exactly the way it looked on November 22, 1963. And I seriously doubt that it looked like that. I seriously doubt that it EVER looked like that. 

Backes has already shown us that there is nothing inherently crappy about Youtube. 

Backes said that those frames were from Youtube. So, I want to see the Towner film as good as that on Youtube- or other independent media. I don't want to see any crap from the Sixth Floor Musuem. The Sixth Floor Museum is involved in lying about the murder of President Kennedy. They are protecting the killers of President Kennedy. They are covering up the truth and perpetuating the lies about the JFK assassination, and that is all they have ever done. That is all that they are about. They are among the bad guys, Backes.  And if Joseph Backes were a real JFK truther and Oswald defender, he would know better than to trust the Sixth Floor Museum. So, don't show me any of their bogus stuff; they are liars. Evil, dastardly, blood-soaked liars. 

Here's what you said, Backes:

How embarrassing because there is no illusion at all. You're stupid!