Saturday, June 21, 2014

Hey Flipper! Unger! What do you think of this guy with his hand on backwards?



Are you going to admit that this film was altered? But, if this film was altered, how can it be the only one? Think about it: there are all these JFK films and images, but the ONLY one that it occurred to them to alter is this one? Isn't it far more likely that if they took to altering ANY images, that they must have considered altering EVERY image? And found plenty that they wanted to alter? That's how it looks to me. 

And sure this looks goofy, but it's no goofier than trying to stick a guy at a desk who wasn't there. Or trying to stick a cartoon version of a mother and baby into a film. Or painting a shirt on a guy who wore only a t-shirt at the time. These were arrogant people who were way too confident about what they could get away with. They really should have just destroyed the Altgens photo as soon as they saw that Oswald was in it.  And why they thought they could get away with trying to turn him into Lovelady when he is still wearing Oswald's clothes, I don't know. But, it was a bad idea; an absolutely terrible idea. 

Start your response by addressing the backwards hand. I don't want to hear anything else. 

     

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.