Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The Idiot Backes keeps quoting Fritz' statement to the Warren Commission that he took no notes, and the idea that he was lying is anathema to Backes. 

Now, think about the inherent contradiction that spews from the crippled mind of this stupid Backass:

a) on the one hand, Backes thinks that Fritz not only lied about Oswald having ridden the bus and cab, but he engaged in an elaborate and protracted fraud which involved a phony bus transfer ticket being planted on Oswald plus phony witnesses who were rounded up and prepped to give false testimony.  

b) But, Fritz must have spoken the truth when he said he took no notes because, after all, he said it. 

It's not a matter of understanding; it's a matter of accepting. And, I don't accept it. And, the part of "I kept no notes at the time" that I don't accept is: all of it. And, it's precisely because Fritz said it. 

Now, what part of "being a liar" do you not understand? Because Fritz was a liar. He lied about Oswald's alibi during the shooting. He should have told the Commission that Oswald said he was "out with Bill Shelley in front." Instead, Fritz took something that Oswald said that he did earlier- well before the assassination- which was to eat lunch in the first floor lunch room at a time when Junior Jarman and Harold Norman were milling around, and he shifted it, fraudulently, to the time of the assassination. Fritz actually had the nerve to say that Oswald said he was eating lunch with other employees during the shooting. That is so ridiculous. The employees were let go for lunch at 11:45 AM, which may have been earlier than usual. Why? Precisely so that they could get their biological needs met before the President's arrival at 12:30. That was 45 minutes to eat, drink, urinate, and defecate. There is no reason to think that ANYBODY in that company put off eating lunch to the time of the motorcade, and certainly not Oswald and others. IT WAS A LIE! A bold-faced lie. Fritz wasn't called on it because the WC wanted him to lie. They didn't want the truth. The whole investigation was a whitewash.  

So, what you need to do, Backass, is that when you read "I kept no notes at the time", you don't take it literally. Instead, you take it as code for: 

"I took notes, but I can't show them to you because Oswald said he was out with Bill Shelley in front during the shooting, and I know you don't want to hear that. So, let's just assume that I took no notes."

Comprende? Capisce? That's how it works, Backes. That's how it went down. But, it requires that you be something more than a blockhead with nothing but a proscenium arch between his ears. 

Now, Backes has pulled something new from out his ass: the idea that the lying, fabricating Fritz first was going to go with just the fake bus ride for Oswald. But then, they realized that the bus they faked him on would not have gotten him to Oak Hill in time to kill Tippit. So, they had to take him off that bus and stick him in a cab. 

It says the 2nd interview on the 23rd. So, that's quite a lot later. But, let's be realistic about something here: Oswald wasn't arrested until 1:45, and he didn't reach the PD until 2:00. And his very first interview didn't start until 3:15. And presumably, they didn't know what he was going to tell them about how he got to the Theater. Yet, by 4:00, they announced about the bus ride and showed reporters the transfer ticket. It was 4:05 to be exact. 

So, when did they concoct the scheme? You can't tell me that they concocted it in 45 minutes. If you're going to go with it, you have to stipulate that the police conceived of it much earlier and were working on it and laying it out before Oswald was even arrested, and before they knew what he was going to say about his movements.  

So, why couldn't they stick him on a bus that would get him to Oak Hill in time? Why couldn't they monitor the situation and pick a bus that worked? And if no bus worked, then why not just have him take a cab and be done with it? One thing. Keep it simple.

What the childish Backes is doing here is just letting his imagination run wild. It's preposterous to think that they were scheming such a lie because there were too many unknowns. What if somebody came forward who saw Oswald during the odyssey that he actually took which contradicted the official story about the bus and cab? How would they deal with that? 

And why did the conspirators allow Oswald to be picked up in Dealey Plaza if he was supposed to be the lone gunman? If they thought it looked better for him to travel by public transportation, then why not let him do it? Why let someone pick him up and then have to make up this fanciful story? If they didn't want him to travel that way, couldn't they have prevented it? Who picked him up, Backes? Who did Oswald ask for a ride? And if it wasn't his idea, then whose idea was it? It couldn't have been the same people that framed him because they didn't want him traveling that way. Don't you think they were controlling him every step of the way? Don't you think they told him to go to the Texas Theater? You don't think he had a hankering for a war movie, do you? So, whomever told Oswald to go the Theater would also have covered his means of getting there and made sure it was consistent with the story they were telling about a lone gunman with no accomplices. So how did this one aspect of the thing- a getaway driver- slip from their hands? And if it didn't slip from their hands, if they, the conspirators, arranged it, why did they arrange it? If it wasn't good for them, why did they do it? 

You're stupid, Backes. It doesn't work. You're twisting and weaving and trying to pounding a square peg into a round hole- which is your usual nightly routine. But, this one doesn't fit; it doesn't work; and you're just too stupid to realize it.