Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I just thought of something else. This is getting more conspicuously flagrant all the time. Joseph Landwermeyer said that we're seeing BJ Martin's right hand in the lower right corner of the picture.

So, that thing on the right that looks like a claw, directly above, is supposed to be his right hand grabbing the right handlebar of the bike. But, how could the left side of his bike be cut out? It was taken by somebody on the grass, and she was farther left than the left side of the bike. She had to capture everything between her and the Kennedys. She was behind. We know she was behind because she caught the back of the Kennedys heads. So she, whoever she was, was shooting from behind and to the right, and pointing her camera at the Kennedys. So, how could she not capture BJ Martin's left side?

Let's try it this way. This is the image that Robin Unger posted to indicate when the Moorman photo was taken. He's wrong. But still, I want you to look it, and I'll explain why.

You see Mary on the right in her black coat. She doesn't appear to have her camera up, which makes it hard to believe that she could have taken a picture at that moment. But, try to imagine how she could capture BJ Martin's right side without capturing his left. She's on the grass or the curb, but he is in the street. If she is aiming her camera at the Kennedys, then light is going to enter her camera that includes everything in the street between her and them. How could she possibly cut Martin off to where it's only his right arm in the picture? It's impossible! She is left of him, so her camera, in its view, is going to get to his left side before it gets to his right side. It couldn't visualize his right side without visualizing his left side, not when she's shooting from the left side. She is shooting left TO right.  

In the above picture, the photographer is behind Martin and to the left of Martin. So, how can she capture his right side without capturing his left side? 

Imagine if it was a gun instead of a camera. If she is behind him and to his left, how can she shoot him in his right hand? She can't. She could only do that if she was on his right side. 

I don't know who did this lousy artwork, but it is bad, and it makes no sense. There is no way that anyone shooting from behind and left of a person could capture his right side without capturing his left. We are talking about the path of photons. 

She was left and back. He was right and forward. The light rays know no gaps. They travel from A to B. She couldn't possibly capture his right and not his left. This is bullshit!